Founder effect in tupian languages

Autores/as

  • Cilene Rodrigues Pontifícia Universidade Católica-RJ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35520/diadorim.2020.v22n3a38007

Palabras clave:

Founder Effect, Territorial Dispersal, Genetic Variation, Phonemic Inventory, Vowels.

Resumen

Since Mayr (1954, 1963), it has been observed that territorial expansions may cause founder effects, reducing the genetic variability of the founder population. A similar effect has been reported within linguistic typology, as the phonemic inventory size of a language is reduced due to territorial dispersal of its speakers. Atkinson (2011) analyzes global present-day phoneme inventory size as a reflection of a serial found effect caused by human exodus out of Africa during the Paleolithic period: the further a language is from eastern-southern Africa, the smaller its phonemic inventory is. Recent studies have shown that this founder effect may interact with other factors such as population size and language contact and isolation. In the present study, we analyze the phonemic effects of the dispersal of Tupi-Guarani people. Taking the basins of Madeira and Guaporé rivers to be the birthplace of Proto-Tupi (RODRIGUES, 1964), we investigated whether physical distance from Madeira- Guaporé is related with phonemic clines within Tupi-Guarani languages located in the southwest region of South America. We also analyzed whether population size is a significant factor, but it did not interact with phonemic inventory size. A variance test, however, showed that languages in the Madeira-Guaporé region present, among themselves, more vocalic variation than southwest Tupi-Guarani languages. This result is compatible with a founder effect. Contrasting with Tupi languages spoken in Madeira-Guaporé, southwest Tupi-Guarani languages are quite harmonious with respect to vowels, presenting two symmetrical series of nasal and oral vowels. This result and the general discursion we present here converse with studies on reconstruction of Proto Tupian languages, and with investigations on the mental representation of vowels and consonants (NESPOR et al., 2003). If vowels are markers of structural relations, we predict that there is more structural cohesion (less parametric variation) among Southwest Tupi-Guarani than among Tupi languages at Madeira-Guaporé.

Biografía del autor/a

Cilene Rodrigues, Pontifícia Universidade Católica-RJ

Cilene Rodrigues é professora assistente do Departamento de Letras. Atua nos cursos de graduação em Letras e na pós-graduação em Estudos da Linguagem. Doutora em Linguística pela Universidade de Maryland, College Park, tem especialização em sintaxe teórica. Suas áreas de interesse são: Sintaxe e interfaces, gramática e processamento. Cilene Rodrigues é membro do LAPAL- PUC-Rio: Laboratório de Processamento e Aquisição da Linguagem: LAPAL.

Citas

AGUILAR, A. C. Contribuições para os estudos histórico-comparativos sobre a diversificação do sub-ramo vi da família linguística Tupí-Guaraní. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de Brasília, 2015.

ALMEIDA, F.; NEVES, E. Evidências arqueológicas para a origem do Tupi-Guarani no Leste da Amazônia. Mana – Estudos de Antropologia Social, v. 21, 499-525, 2015.

ATKINSON, Q. Phomenic Diversity supports a founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science, v. 332, p. 346-349, 2011.

BARTON, N. H.; CHARLESWORTH, B. Genetic revolution, founder effects and speciation. Annual review of ecology and systematics, v. 15, p. 133-164, 1984.

BISSO-MACHADO, R., BORTOLINI, M. C., SALZANO, F. M. Uniparental genetic

markers in South Amerindians. Genetic Molecular Biology, v. 35, p. 365-387, 2012.

BRAGA, A. A fonologia segmental e aspectos morfofonológicos da língua Makurap. MA thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 1992.

BROCHADO, J. P. An Ecological Model of the Spread of Pottery and Agriculture into eastern South America. PhD dissertation. Urbana-Champaign: University of lIIinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984.

CAMPBELL, L. Areal linguistics. In Wright, J. D (ed.) International encyclopedia of the social & Behavior sciences. 2ed. P. 955-60, 2015.

CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L. 2001. Genes, people and language. University of California Press.

CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L.; MENOZZI, P.; PIAZZA, A. 1993. The history and geography and human genes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

COOK, L. M.; GRANT, B. S.; SACCHERI, I. J.; MALLET, J. Selective brid predation on the peppered moth: the last experiment of Michael Majerus. Biology Letter, v. 23, p. 602-612, 2012.

COSTA. C. Apyngwa rupigwa: nasalização em Nhandewa-Guarani. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2007.

CREANZA, N.; RUHLEN, M.; PEMBERTON, J. T.; ROSENBERG, N. A.; FELDMAN, M.

W.; RAMACHANDRAN, S. A comparison of worldwide phonemic and genetic variation in human populations. PNAS, v. 112, p. 1265-1272, 2015.

CRYSTAL. D. Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

CYSOUW, M.; DEDIU, D.; MORAN, S. 2012. Comments on “Phonemic diversity supports

of serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa”. Science, 335: 657. DIETRICH, W. O tronco Tupi e suas famílias de línguas. Classificação e esboço tipológico. Volker, N.; Dietrich, W. (eds.) O Português e o Tupi no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2010, p. 9-25.

DLUGOSCH, K. M.; PARKER, I. M. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution and the role of multiple introductions. Molecular Ecology, v. 17, p. 431-449, 2008.

DONATTI, L; PEÑA, M.; NESPOR, M.; MEHLER, J. 2007. On consonants and vowels, chickens and eggs. Psychological Science, v. 18, p. 924-925, 2007.

DRYER, M.; HASPELMATH, M. (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2005. (Available online at http://wals.info, Accessed on 2019-10-26.)

DUARTE, F. B. Diversidade linguística no Brasil: a situação das línguas ameríndias. Calestroscópio, v. 4, p. 27-62, 2016.

GABAS, N. J. Tupian Languages. In: BROWN, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, p. 146-150, 2006.

GASPARINI. N. Observations on sociolinguistiques et esquisse de la phonologie du siriono. Langue Tupí-guarani de Bolivie. MA thesis, Lumière Lyon 2, 2012.

GONZÁLEZ, H. A. A grammar of Tapiete (Tupi-Guarani). PhD dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, 2005.

GREENBERG, J. H. The languages of Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1963. GÜLDEMANN, T. Clicks, genetics, and “proto-world” from a linguistic perspective. University of Leipzig Papers on Africa, Languages and Literatures, v. 29, 1-32. 2007.

FLEMING, L. Phoneme inventory size and the transition from monoplanar to dually patterned speech. Journal of Language Evolution, v. 2, p. 52-66, 2017.

FORT, J.; PERÉZ-LOSADA, J. Can a linguistic serial founder effect in Africa explain the worldwide phonemic cline? Journal of the Royal Society Interface, v. 13, 20160185, 1–9. 2016.

FUTUYMA, D. J. Evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, INC, 2005.

HAY, J.; BAUER, L. Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language, v. 83, p. 388- 400, 2007.

HOCHMANN, J. R.; BENAVIDES-VARELA, S.; NESPOR, M.; MEHLER, J. 2011.

Consonants and vowels: different roles in early language acquisition. Developmental Science, v. 14, p. 1467-1687, 2011.

HOCKETT, C. F. The Origin of Speech. Scientific American, v. 203, p. 88-111, 1960.

IVO, I. Características fonéticas e fonológicas do Guarani no Brazil. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2018.

KNEIP, A.; MELLO, A. Babel indígena: arqueologia e linguística pode ajudar a revelar origem e trajetória dos Tupis e Guaranis, que se dispersaram pelo território que se tornaria o Brasil. Dossiê Nação Indígena. 2013.

LATHRAP, D. W. The upper Amazon. New York: Praeger, 1970.

LEMLE, L. Internal classification of the Tupi-Guarani linguistic family. In.: BENDOR- SAMUEL, D. (ed.) Tupi Studies. Norman: Oklahoma: Summer Institute of Linguistics. 1971, p. 107-129.

LEWIS, M. P. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International, 2009. http://www.ethnologue.com/16.

MADDIESON, I.; PRECODA, K. The UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database, 1990. http://web.phonetik. uni-frankfurt.de/upsid_info.html.

MAIA, M.; FRANCHETTO, B.; LEMLE, M.; DAMASO-VIEIRA, M. 2019. Línguas

indígenas e Gramática Universal. São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2019.

MARQUES, A. M.; RENESTO, E. Genetic variability and evidence of founder effect in Hemiodus orthonops (Characiformes: Hemiodontidae) from the upper Paraná River Basin, Brazil. Acta Scientiarim, Biological Sciences, V. 39, p. 53-58, 2017.

MAYR, E., Change of genetic environment and evolution. In.: HUXLEY, J.; HARDY, A. C.; FORD, E. B. (eds.) Evolution as a Process. London: Allen & Unwin. 1954, p. 157–180.

. Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1963.

. What evolution is. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2013.

MCKUSICK, V. A. Ellis-van Creveld syndrome and the Amish. Nature Genetics, v. 24, p. 203-204, 2000.

MEIRA, S.; DRUDE, S. A summary reconstruction of Proto-mawetí-guarani segmental phonology. Boletim do Museu Paranaense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, v. 10, p. 275- 69, 2015.

MELLO, A. A. S. Estudo histórico da família linguística Tupi-Guarani: aspectos fonológicos e lexicais. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2000.

MICHAEL, L.; CHOUSOU-POLYDOURI, N.; BARTOLOMEI, K.; DONNELY, E;

WAUTERS, V.; MEIRA, S.; O’HAGAN, Z. A Bayesian phylogenetic classification of Tupí- Guaraní. Liames, v. 15, p. 193-221, 2015.

MILLER, A. 2011. The representation of Clicks. In.: VAN OOSTENDORP, M. et al. (eds.)

The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, p. 416-439. MARÇOLI, O. Estudos comparativos dos dialetos da lígua Kawahib (Tupi-Guarani): Tenharim, Jiahui e Amondawa. MA thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2018.

MARTINS, M. F. Descrição e análise de aspectos da gramática do Guarani Mbyá. PhD. Dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2003.

MOORE, D.; MEYER, J. The study of tone and related phenomena in an Amazonian tone language, Gavião of Rondônia. Language Documentation & Conservation, v.8, p. 613-636, 2014.

NESPOR, M.; PEÑA. M.; MEHLER. J. On the different roles of vowles and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio, v. 2, p. 2003-2229, 2003.

NETTLE, D.; ROMAINE, S. Vanishing voices: the extinction of the world’s language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

NIMUENDAJÚ, C. The Cawahib, Parintintin and their neighbors. In: STEWARD, J. (ed.) Handbook of South American indians, Vol. 3. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1948, 283-297.

NOELLI, F. As hipóteses sobre os centros de origem e as rotas de expansão dos tupi. Revista de Antropologia, v. 39, p.7-53, 1996.

PAYNE, M.; RUPAR, A.; SIU. G. M.; SIU, V. M. Amish, Mennonite and Hutterite genetic disorder database. Paediatric Child Health, v. 16, p. e23-e24, 2011.

PERREAULT, C.; MATHEW, S. Dating the Origin of Language Using Phonemic Diversity.

PLoS One, v. 7, p. e352-89, 2012.

PIERCE, S. B.; YOST, C.; BRITTON, J. S.; LOO, L. W. M.; FLYNN, E. M.; EDGAR, B.A.;

EISENMAN, R. N. dMyc is required for larval growth and endoreplication in Drosophila. Development, v. 131, p. 2317-2317, 2004.

RAMALLO, V.; BISSO-MACHADO, R.; BRAVI, C.; COBLE, M. D.; SALZANO, F. M.;

HUNEMEIER, T.; BORTOLINI, M. C. Demographic Expansions in South America: Enlightening a Complex Scenario with Genetic and Linguistic Data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, v. 150, p. 453-463, 2013.

RAMACHANDRAN, S.; DESHPANDE, O.; ROSEMAN, C.; ROSENBERG. N.;

FELDMAN, M.; CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. Support from the relationship of genetic and geographic distance in human populations for a serial founder effect originating in Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 102, p. 15 942–15 947, 2015.

RIDDLEY, M. Evolution. Third edition. Backwell, 2004.

RITO, T.; VIEIRA, D.; SILVA, M.; CONDE-SOUSA, E.; PEREIRA, L.; MELLARS, P.;

RICHARDS, M.; SOARES, P. A dispersal of Homo sapiens from southern to eastern Africa immediately preceded the out-of-Africa migration. Scientific Reports, 9, 2019.

RODRIGUES, A. D. 1964. Classificação do tronco linguístico Tupi. Revistade Antropologia, v. 12, p. 99-104, 1964.

______. Relações internas na família Tupí-Guaraní. Revista de Antropologia, v. 27, p. 33- 53, 1985.

______. Línguas brasileiras: para o conhecimento das línguas indígenas. São Paulo: Loyola, 1986

______. 2005. As vogais orais do Proto-Tupí. In.: RODRIGUES, A. D.; CABRAL, A. S. A.C. (eds.) Novos estudos sobre línguas indígenas. Brasília: Editora da UnB, 2005, p. 35-46.

. Tupí languages in Rondônia and in eastern Bolivia. In.: WETZELS, L. (ed.) Language endangerment and endangered languages. Leiden: CNWS Publications. 2007a, 355-363.

______. As consoantes do Proto-Tupí. In.: CABRAL, A. S. A. C.; RODRIGUES, A. D. (eds.) Línguas e culturas Tupí. Campinas: Editora Curt Nimuendajú, 2007b, p.167-203.

______. Línguas indígenas brasileiras. Brasília. LALI - Laboratório de Línguas Indígenas da UnB, 2013. http://www.laliunb.com.br.

______.; DIETRICH, W. 1997. On the linguistic relationship between Mawé and Tupi- Guarani. Diachronica, v. 14, p. 265-304. 1997.

______; CABRAL, A. S. A. C. Revendo a classificação interna da família linguística Tupí- Guaraní. In.: CABRAL, A. S. A. C.; RODRIGUES, A. D. (eds.) Línguas Indígenas Brasileiras: Fonologia, gramática e história. Belém: UFPA, 2002, p. 327-337.

.; . 2012. Tupían. In.: CAMPBELL, L.; GRONDONA, V. (eds.). The

indigenous languages of South America. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, v. 2, 2012, p. 495-574. SAMPAIO, W. Estudo comparativo sincrônico entre o Parintintin (Tenharim) e o Uru-eu- uau-uau (Amondwa): contribuições para uma revisão na classificação das línguasupi- Kawahib. MA thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 1998.

SANTOS, E.; SILVA, A.; EWERTON, P.; TAKESHITA, L.; MAIA, M. Origins and

demographic dymanics of Tupí expansion: a genetic tale. Boletim do Museu Paranaense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, v. 10, p. 217-28, 2015.

SCHLEICHER, C. Comparative and internal reconstruction of the Tupi-Guarani language family. PhD Dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison. 1998.

SIMONS, G. F. Two centuries of spreading languages loss. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, v. 4, p. 1-12. 2019.

SPROAT, R. Phonemic diversity and the out-of-Africa theory. Linguistic Typology, v. 15, p. 199–206, 2011.

STORTO, L.; DEMOLIN, D. Pitch accent in Karitiana. Ms., Universidade de São Paulo, 2005.

TRUDGILL, P. Social Structure and Phoneme Inventories. Linguistic Typology, v. 15, p. 155- 60, 2011.

URBAN, G. A história da cultura brasileira segundo as línguas nativas. In.: CUNHA, M. C (ed.) História dos índios no Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. 1992, p. 87-102.

URBAN, G. On the geographical origins and dispersion of Tupian languages. Revista de Antropologia, v. 39 p. 61-104, 1996.

VASCONCELOS, E. Aspectos fonológicos das línguas Xetá. MA thesis. Universidade de Brasília, 2008.

YANG, N.N.; MAZIÈRES, S.; BRAVI, C.; RAY, N.; WANG, S.; BURLEY, M. W.;

BEDOYA, G.; ROJAS, W.; PARRA, M.V.; MOLINA, J. A. Contrasting patterns of nuclear and mtDNA diversity in Native American populations. Annals Human Genetics, v. 74, p. 525–538, 2010.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-12-23

Número

Sección

Artigos de Língua