Is brazilian capitalism at an institutional equilibrium?: a varieties of capitalism approach1
Palavras-chave:
Brazil, Varieties of Capitalism, State-firm interactionResumo
Given that Brazilian capitalism does not fit any single ideal type variety of capitalism, the article discusses whether Brazilian capitalism is still evolving towards an ideal type or whether it is already at a hybrid institutional equilibrium. The analysis focuses on the production regime with special reference to capital- labour-state relations and examines how firm strategies and public policy impact the nature of capitalism in Brazil. The analysis shows how firms might actually be pulling Brazilian capitalism in a different direction than the state.
Referências
ALCORTA, L. and W. PERES. 1998. ‘Innovation systems and technological specialization in Latin America and the Caribbean’ Research Policy, 26, pp 857-881.
AMABLE, B. 2000. ‘Institutional Complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production’, Review of International Political Economy, 7:4, pp 645-687.
ARBIX, G. 2007. Innovative firms in three emerging economies; a comparison between the Brazilian, Mexican and Argentine industrial elite. Manuscript.
BARROS DE CASTRO, A. 2008. ‘Da semi-estagnação ao crescimento num mercado sino-centrico’. Manuscript.
BOYER, R. 2008. ‘How and why capitalisms differ’, Economy and Society, 34:4, pp 509-557
BRESSER-PEREIRA, L.C. 2009. ‘From old to new developmentalism in Latin America’, Textos para Discussão no. 193, Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas.
COATES, D. 2000. Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
DAHLMAN, C. and C. FRISCHTAK. 1993. ‘National systems supporting technical advance in industry: the Brazilian experience’ in R. Nelson (ed), National Innovation Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DELGADO, I. G. 2008. ‘Variedades de Capitalismo e política industrial: o caso Brasileiro em perspectiva comparada’. Paper at XXI Jornadas de História Economica, Argentina.
DE NEGRI, J., M. SALERNO, and A. BARROS DE CASTRO. 2005. Innovations, technological patterns, and performance of Brazilian industrial companies. Brasilia, IPEA
DE NEGRI, J. and L. KUBOTA (eds). 2008. Políticas de Incentivo á Inovação Tecnológica, Brasília: IPEA.
DINIZ, E. and R. BOSCHI. 2003. ‘Empresariado e Estratégias de Desenvolvimento’ Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais, 18:52, pp 15-33
DOCTOR, M. 2007. ‘Boosting investment and growth: the role of social pacts in the Brazilian automotive industry’ Oxford Development Studies, 35:1, pp 105-130
DOCTOR, M. 2007a. ‘Lula’s Development Council’, Latin American Perspectives, 34:6, pp 131-148
DOCTOR. M. & L. DE PAULA. 2007. ‘Brazil: Mixed impact of financial crises on the manufacturing and financial sectors’ in Justin Robertson (ed), Power and Politics after Financial Crises: Rethinking Foreign Opportunism in Emerging Markets, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
DOCTOR, M. 2009. ‘Furthering industrial development in Brazil: Globalisation and the national innovation system’. Paper at Latin American Studies Association (LASA) Congress, Rio de Janeiro.
GOLDTHORPE, J. (ed.). 1984. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism.
HALL, P. & D. SOSKICE. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: the Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HUBER, E. 2002. Models of Capitalism: Lessons for Latin America. University Park: Penn State Press.
HUBER, E. & J.D. STEPHENS. 2009. ‘Globalization and Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean’.
KITSCHELT, H., P. LANGE, G. MARKS & J.D. STEPHENS (eds.) 1999. Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KATZ, J. 2006. ‘Structural change and domestic technological capabilities’ CEPAL Review 89, pp 55- 68
MALONEY, W. and G. PERRY. 2005. ‘Towards an efficient innovation policy in Latin America’ CEPAL Review 87, pp: 25-43
MCT. 2007. Plano de Ação 2007-2010: Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovação para o Desenvolvimento Nacional
POWER, T. & M. DOCTOR. 2004. ‘Beyond the Century of Corporatism? Continuity and Change in Brazil’, in Howard J. Wiarda (ed), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, Revisited Gainsville: University of Florida Press.
SALERNO, M. and L. KUBOTA. 2008. ‘Estado e Inovação’ in J. de Negri and L. Kubota (eds),
Políticas de Incentivo á Inovação Tecnológica, Brasília: IPEA.
SCHMIDT, V. 2002. The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SCHNEIDER, R. R. 2009. ‘Hierarchical Market Economies and Varieties of Capitalism in Latin America’ Journal of Latin American Studies, 41:3, pp 553-575
SCHNEIDER, B. R. 2008. Hierarchical Market Economies and Varieties of Capitalism in Latin America. Manuscript.
SOSKICE, D. 1999. ‘Divergent Production Regimes: coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s’ in Kitschelt, H., P. Lange, G. Marks & J.D. Stephens (eds.) Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
STIGLITZ, J. 2005. ‘Development policies in a world of globalisation’ in Gallagher, K. (ed) Putting Development First. London: Zed Press, pp 15-32
SUZIGAN, W. and J. FURTADO. 2006. ‘Industrial policy and development’ CEPAL Review 89, pp 69- 84
