The Role of Public Administration in Environmental Governance: a Case Study based on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
Palavras-chave:
Environmental Governance, Public Policy, Institutional Development, Public Administration.Resumo
This article draws upon theory and a case study to research public administration’s role in environmental governance systems. Thus, it examines Brazil’s environmental regulation of the offshore oil and gas sector. The methodology used follows the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework and supports interviews, documentation review and direct observation. The results indicate the main features of the institutional setting, including the rules in use and relevant external variables. Concluding, three key elements operating at the organizational level are highlighted: the means of stakeholder participation; the stability and forms of interaction within the personnel; and the autonomy to enforce established arrangements.
Referências
AGRAWAL, A. Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resources: Context, Methods, and Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, v. 32, p. 243-62, 2004.
ALIGICA, P. D.;TARKO, V. Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and Beyond. Governance, n. 25, p. 237–262, 2012.
ALMADA, G. V. M. B.; BERNARDINO, A. F. Conservation of Deep-Sea Ecosystems within Offshore Oil Fields on the Brazilian Margin, SW Atlantic. Biological Conservation, n. 206, p. 92-101, 2017.
ANP - Agência Nacional do Petróleo Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis. Anuário Estatístico Brasileiro Do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis 2018. Anp/ Mme, 2018. Available at: Accessed March 21, 2019.
ANSELL, C.; GASH, A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 18, p. 543–571, 2008.
ARMITAGE, D.; BERKES, F.; DOUBLEDAY, N. Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-Level Governance. Canada: UBC Press, 2007.
BAKKE, T.; KLUNGSOYR, J.;SANNI, S. Environmental Impacts of Produced Water and Drilling Waste Discharges from the Norwegian Offshore Petroleum Industry. Marine Environmental Research, n. 92, 154- 169, 2013.
BERKES, F. Conexões institucionais transescalares. In: VIEIRA, P. F.; BERKES F.; SEIXAS C. S. Gestão integrada e participativa de recursos naturais: conceitos, métodos e experiências, Florianópolis: Ed. Secco/APED, 2005. p. 293-332.
BERKES, F.; FOLKE, C. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Brasil. IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis. 2012b. Instrução Normativa nº 2, de 27 de março de 2012. Estabelece as bases técnicas para programas de educação ambiental apresentados como medidas mitigadoras ou compensatórias, em cumprimento às condicionantes das licenças ambientais emitidas pelo Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis – IBAMA. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 29 de março de 2012.
Brasil. MMA – Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2011. Portaria N°422, de 26 de outubro de 2011. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 26 de outubro de 2011.
Brasil. MMA / MME – Ministério de Meio Ambiente / Ministério de Minas e Energia. 2012a. Portaria Interministerial N°198 de 5 de abril de 2012. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 9 de abril de 2012.
BREDARIOL, T. O.; VINHA, V. G. Instituições e Governança Ambiental: Uma Revisão Teórica. Revista Iberoamericano de Economia Ecológica, n. 24, p. 153-162, 2015. Available at: https://bit.ly/2QgwpmF. Accessed: March 21, 2019.
BREDARIOL, T. O.; D’AVIGNON, A. L. Institutions and environmental governance: The case of environmental permitting for offshore oil and gas projects. Ambiente e Sociedade, n. 21, 2018, p. 22.
CASH, D. W.;ADGER,W. N.; BERKES, F.; GARDEN, P.; LEBEL, L.; OLSSON, P.; PRITCHARD, L.; YOUNG, O. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, v. 11, n. 2, p. 8, 2006. Available at: https://bit.ly/3htai8o. Accessed: March 21, 2019.
CAVALCANTI, C. Economia e Ecologia: Problemas Da Governança Ambiental No Brasil. Revista Iberoamericana de Economia Ecológica, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2004.
CGU. Controladoria Geral da União. Relatório de Auditoria Anual de Contas: IBAMA – Sede, Exercício 2012.2012. Available at: https://bit.ly/2EpWZHc. Accessed March 21, 2019.
CORDES, E. E.; JONES, D. O.; SCHLACHER, T. A.; AMON, D. J.; BERNARDINO, A. F.; BROOKE, S.; CARNEY, R. et al. Environmental Impacts of the Deep-Water Oil and Gas Industry: A Review to Guide Management Strategies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, v. 4, n. 58, 2016.
CRUZ, F. B.; MONTANO, M.Evidências de aprendizagem na AIA: estudo de caso para o setor de óleo e gás no Brasil. 3° Congresso Brasileiro de Avaliação de Impacto.Ribeirão Preto: USP, 2016.Available at: https://bit. ly/3aNTuqf. Accessed: March 21, 2019.
DAVIDSON, D. J.;FRICKEL, S. Understanding Environmental Governance: A Critical Review. Organizational Environment, n. 17, 471-492, 2004.
DIETZ, T.; OSTROM, E. & STERN, P. C. Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science, 302 (5652), 1907-12, 2003. ENROTH, H. Governance: The Art of Governing after Governmentality. European Journal of Social Theory, v. 17, n. 1, p. 60–76, 2014.
FOLKE, C.; BIGGS, R.; NORSTROM, A. V.; REYERS, B.; ROCKSTROM, J. Social- Ecological Resilience and Biosphere-Based Sustainability Science. Ecology and Society, v. 2, n. 3, 41, 2016.
FOLKE, C.; HAHN, T.; OLSSON, P.; NORBERG, J.Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, v. 30, n. 1, p; 441–473, 2005.
FOLKE, C.; PRITCHARD, L.; BERKES, F.; COLDING, J.; SVEDIN, U. The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions: Ten Years Later. Ecology and Society12 (1): 30, 2007.
GRAAF, H. J.; MUSTERS, C. J.M.; KEURS, W. J. Sustainable Development: Looking for New Strategies. Ecological Economics, n. 16, p. 205-216, 1996.
GUNNINGHAM, N. The New Collaborative Environmental Governance: The Localization of Regulation. Journal of Law and Society, v. 36, n. 1, p. 145–166, 2009.
HOLLING, C. S. Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems. Ecosystems, n. 4, p. 390- 405, 2001.
KARKKAINEN, B. C. Post-Sovereign Environmental Governance. Global Environment and Politics, v. 4, n. 1, 72–96, 2004.
KINGSTON, C.; CABALLERO, G. Comparing Theories of Institutional Change. Journal of Institutional Economics, v. 5, n. 2, p. 151-180, 2009.
LEMOS, M. C.; AGRAWAL, A.Environmental Governance. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, v. 31, n. 1, p. 297–325, 2006.
LUSTOSA, M. C.; CÁNEPA, E. M.; YOUNG, C. E.“Política ambiental.”InEconomia do meio ambiente: teoria e prática, edited by: MAY, P. H.Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2d ed., 2010, p. 33-48.
MARIANO, J.; LA ROVERE, E. Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities in Brazil: The Consideration of Environmental Issues in the Bidding Rounds Promoted by the National Petroleum Agency. Energy Policy, n. 35, p. 2899–2911, 2007.
MCGINNIS, M. D. Costs and Challenges of Polycentric Governance: An Equilibrium Concept and Examples from U.S. Health Care. Conference on Self-Governance, Polycentricity, and Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing. SSRN, 2013.
NAIME, A. An Evaluation of a Risk-Based Environmental Regulation in Brazil: Limitations to Risk Management of Hazardous Installations. Environmental Impact AssessmentReview, n. 63, p. 35-43, 2017.
NEWIG, J.; FRITSCH, O.Environmental Governance: Participatory, Multi-Level – and Effective?.Environmental Policy and Governance, v. 19, n. 3, p. 197–214, 2009.
NORTH, D. C. Institutions”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 5, n. 1, p. 97-112, 1991.
OSTROM, E. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
OSTROM, E.A General Framework for Analysing Sustainability of Social- Ecological Systems. Science, v. 325 (5939), p. 419–22, 2009a.
OSTROM, E. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Nobel Prize Lecture, December 8, 2009. 2009b. Available at: https://bit.ly/31rVO3f. Accessed: March 21, 2019.
OSTROM, E. Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, v. 39, n. 1, p. 7–27, 2011.
PAAVOLA, J. Institutions and Environmental Governance: A Reconceptualization. Ecological Economics, v. 63, n. 1, p. 93–103, 2007.
PROMINP-Programa de Mobilização da Indústria Nacional de Petróleo e Gás Natural –. Relatório Final: Aperfeiçoamento do Processo de Licenciamento Ambiental. Available at: https://bit.ly/3lbGEGS. Accessed: March 21, 2019.
SANTOS, F.; SZWAKO, J. Da Ruptura à Reconstrução Democrática No Brasil. Saúde em Debate, n. 40, p. 114-121, 2017.
SWEETMAN, A. K., THURBER, A. R., SMITH, C. R., et al. Major impacts of climate change on deep-sea benthic ecosystems, Elementa Science Anthology, v. 5, p. 4, 2017.
VILARDO, C.; BARBOSA, A. F.Can You Hear the Noise? Environmental Licensing of Seismic Surveys in Brazil Faces Uncertain Future after 18 Years Protecting Biodiversity. Perspectives in Ecological Conservation, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-60, 2018.
PAHL-WOSTL, C. A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi- Level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes. Global Environmental Change, n. 19, p. 354-365, 2009.
YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2001.
