BRIEF ASSESSMENTS ON LEGAL PERSONALITY AND LIABILITY

a discussion between artificial intelligence technologies in patents

Autores

  • Giovanna Martins Sampaio Universidade Federal da Bahia
  • João Antonio Belmino dos Santos Universidade Federal do Sergipe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21728/p2p.2023v10n1e-72575

Palavras-chave:

Patents, Artificial Intelligence, Civil Liability, Ethics

Resumo

Sistema de informação de marketing; Bibliotecas; ServiçosBriefly, the research was based in an interdisciplinary approach about the legal ethics involved in the Digital Era, especially concerning the use of Artificial Intelligence in patents' development and rights as a contour; Moreover, the studies encompasseda view on the liability issue, within the broad framework of Contractual Law and licensing. Further, the research addressed the different theories and perspectives on legal capacity, private law, and personality rights, illustratingthe theoretical justice concept to substantiate/underlie the ethical problematics arising from the use of AI. Therefore, this research work encompassed the advantages and disadvantages involved in the Artificial Intelligence scenario, demonstrating the enhanced performance and outcomes in the industrial property area, accordingly to business practices and techniques, and ethical parameters that should be pursued by the society, to develop a transparent, reliable, trustworthy and explainable use of Artificial Intelligence as a tool especially related to the patent system. Besides, the studies summarily approached the regulatory aspects and legislative policies of AI in the International and European contexts, providing a comparative law picture. Consequently, to achieve this multidisciplinary endeavor, a perspective also centered on data analysis had to be applied, employing mainly the functional method and schemes, with the purpose of better addressing the use of AI in intellectual property and its consequences. Furthermore, it was presented a small introduction to the relevant concepts of the scenario of AI, as well as the readers will find the contextualization of some other concepts throughout this work; later on, it was introduced –and necessarily criticized—the idea of an obligatory insurance scheme for these artificial intelligence technologies to be “pursued” by the AI developers and companies; Further, the work tried to approach some ethical, transparency and legal issues involved in this problematic subject, and to achievethis, some comments about the contractual framework and labor changes were encompassed here, in order to reach the main conclusion of the use of AI as a tool to help the “ delivery” of innovations and improvement of the Patent system as a whole; Regarding the limitations of the present work, since the theme is being very discussed amongst all the related areas, the goal was to address the key and top legal points of civil liability and ethical problems, with their basics notions; therefore, a lot of further ideas could be elaborated and carved.Keywords: patentes; artificial intelligence; civil liability; ethics.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AGRAWAL, Ajay; GANS, Joshua; GOLDFARB, Avi. Artificial Intelligence: the ambiguous Labor market impact of automating prediction. 2019. Journal of Economic Perspectives; Vol 33; n. 2; Pages 31 to 50; Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26621238. Last Access in 17. April. 2020. (jstor platform access)

ANYOHA, Rockwell. The history of Artificial Intelligence. 2017. Available at: http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/history-artificial-intelligence/. Last Access in 13. June. 2020.

BALLER, Ron (PAConsulting). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on IP Policy. 2020. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/about-ip/en/artificial_intelligence/call_for_comments/pdf/org_pa_consulting.pdf. Last Access on 23. May. 2020. (Wipo Website)

BARFIELD, Woodrow. Cyber-Humans: Our Future with Machines. 2015. Springer. 291 pages.

BURK, Dan; LEMLEY, Mark. Policy Levers in Patent Law. 2003. Available at: https://escholarship.org/content/qt4qr081sg/qt4qr081sg.pdf?t=lnqc23. Last Access in 08. June. 2020. (Berkeley Scholarship Program)

CCBE. Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe - Considerations on the legal aspects of artificial intelligence. 2020. Available at: https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/IT_LAW/ITL_Guides_recommendations/EN_ITL_20200220_CCBE-considerations-on-the-Legal-Aspects-of-AI.pdf. Last Access in 22. May. 2020.

CERKA, Paulius; GRIGIENE, Jurgita; SIRBIKYTE, Gintare. Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems? 2017. Elsevier. Computer Law and Security Review; n. 33; Pages 685 to 699 (ULB online archives - Cible Plus) – article

COHEN, Nancy (Tech Xplore). Two AI-led inventions poke at future of patent law. 2019. Available at: https://techxplore.com/news/2019-08-ai-led-future-patent-law.html. Last Access in 21. May. 2020.

EC - European Commission (High—level expert group for artificial intelligence). A definition of AI: main capabilities and scientific disciplines. 2018. Available at: https://laurentcervoni.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/definition_of_ai_18_december.pdf. Last Access in 22. May. 2020.

EC - European Commission. Artificial Intelligence for Europe. 2018. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-artificial-intelligence-europe. Last Access in 25. May. 2020. (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions)

EC - European Commission. Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence. 2018. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:22ee84bb-fa04-11e8-a96d-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF. Last Access in 23. April. 2020. (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions)

EC - European Commission. Liability for Artificial Intelligence: and other emerging digital technologies. 2019. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupMeetingDoc&docid=36608. Last Access in 22. May. 2020.

EPO - European Patent Office. Guidelines for examination - artificial intelligence and Machine Learning. Available at: https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/guidelines2018/e/g_ii_3_3_1.htm. Last Access in 05. April. 2020.

GIUFFRIDA, Iria. Liability for AI Decision-Making: some legal and ethical considerations. 2019. Fordham Law Review; Volume 88; Issue 2; Pages 439 to 456; Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5627&context=flr. Last Access in 24. April. 2020.

GREENBERG, Brad. Rethinking Technology Neutrality. 2016. Minnesota Law Review; Pages 1495 to 1562. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiAtKu254HqAhVF6aQKHVKDApUQFjAAegQIAhAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fosf.io%2F5th94%2Fdownload&usg=AOvVaw17etR3k8J-_gxF_qXrWw_i. Last Access in 08. June. 2020.

HIGGINS, Brian. The Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Patent Law. 2019. Available at: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-role-of-explainable-artificial-59706/. Last Access in 21. May. 2020.

JOSHI, Ameet. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. 2020. Springer. 261 pages. (ULB online archives - Cible Plus) - book

KEATING, Dave (EURACTIV.com). Should the EU embrace artificial intelligence, or fear it? 2019. Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/data-protection/news/should-the-eu-embrace-artificial-intelligence-or-fear-it/. Last Access in 17. April. 2020.

LARSSON, Stefan; HEINTZ, Fredrik. Transparency in Artificial Intelligence. 2020. Internet Policy Review - journal on internet regulation; Vol 9; Issue 2; Available at: https://policyreview.info/concepts/transparency-artificial-intelligence. Last Access in 20. May. 2020.

LIM, Daryl. AI & IP Innovation & Creativity in an Age of Accelerated Change. 2018. Akron Law Review, Pages 813 to 875. Available at: https://repository.jmls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1724&context=facpubs. Last Access in 14. April. 2020. (John Marshal Law School - Institutional Repository).

MILLER, Vaughne. The EU’s Acquis Communautaire. 2011. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/151238/SN05944.pdf. Last Access in 14. May. 2020.

Orgalim (Europe’s Technology Industry-ETI). Policy decoded: the machinery Directive and AI. 2019. Available at:< https://www.orgalim.eu/insights/policy-decoded-machinery-directive-and-ai>. Last Access in 20. May. 2020. (European Technology industries)

PATERSON, Gerald. The European Patent System (the law and practice of the European Patent Convention – Second Edition). 2001. Sweet & Maxwell Publishing House. 948 pages. (physical book)

Politico Eu. Open Letter to the European Commission – Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. 2018. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/RoboticsOpenLetter.pdf. Last Access in 20. April. 2020.

SEKA, Georg (Editor). European Patent Law – practicing under the European Patent Convention (EPC). 1978. Fred B. Rothman & Co. Publisher. 249 pages. (translation into English) – physical book

TURNER, Jacob. Robot Rules - regulating artificial intelligence. 2019. Palgrave Macmillan. 377 pages. (ULB online archives - Cible Plus) – book

VALANT, Jana. Consumer Protection in the EU – Policy Overview (in- depth analysis). 2015. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/96092/1/consumer.1.pdf. Last Access in 12. June 2020. (European Parliament – Members’ Research Service)

WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization. Alternatives in Patent Search and Examination. 2014. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_guide_patentsearch.pdf. Last Access in 05. June. 2020.

WIPO Secretariat - Conversation on IP & AI. Draft Issues Paper on Intellectual Property Policy and Artificial Intelligence. 2019. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20/wipo_ip_ai_2_ge_20_1.pdf. Last Access in 19. May. 2020.

Downloads

Publicado

14-09-2023

Como Citar

SAMPAIO, Giovanna Martins; SANTOS, João Antonio Belmino dos. BRIEF ASSESSMENTS ON LEGAL PERSONALITY AND LIABILITY: a discussion between artificial intelligence technologies in patents. P2P E INOVAÇÃO, Rio de janeiro, v. 10, n. 1, p. 248–268, 2023. DOI: 10.21728/p2p.2023v10n1e-72575. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/p2p/article/view/72575. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2026.

Edição

Seção

Inovação

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)