Stimulating Proenvironmental Behavior at Work With Informal Controls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21446/scg_ufrj.v18i2.57443Keywords:
informal controls, value statement, personal norms, proenvironmental behavior.Abstract
This paper examines whether an informal control in the form of a communicated value statement can activate appropriate employees’ personal norms to promote their proenvironmental behavior. An experimental design is used where the value statement is manipulated in three-levels between-participants (environmental versus financial versus absent). Personal norms are measured, and participants are classified as holding an environmental or a business personal norm. Results show that financial value statements reduce employees’ activation of business personal norms relative to an environmental value statement. Results also show that environmental personal norms increase proenvironmental behavior at work, while business personal norms decrease proenvironmental behavior at work. Finally, results indicate that environmental value statements marginally decrease employees’ proenvironmental behavior through activated business personal norms when compared to a financial value statement. The main results of this study contribute to the literature on the behavioral effects of informal controls by showing the process through which a value statement can influence employees’ proenvironmental behavior. The main practical implication of this paper is that organizations willing to promote employees’ proenvironmental behavior is better off by not communicating an environmental value statement that can lead employees to focus on tradeoffs between short-term costs of environmental initiatives versus long-term benefits of environmental protection.
References
Aguiar, A. B. (2021). Is value statement an effective informal control for stimulating pro-environmental behaviors? Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 32, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202011500
Akinyele, K., Arnold, V., & Sutton, S. G. (2020). Wording and saliency matter: The impact of incentive system and organizational value statement on employees’ performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 32, 101–18. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-18-035
Andrejkow, J., Berger, L., & Guo, L. (2022). Conscious and nonconscious goal pursuit in multidimensional tasks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101376
Arjaliès, D. L., & Mundy, J. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24, 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.003
Ateş, H. (2020). Merging theory of planned behavior and value identity personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.006
Baker, C. R., Cohanier, B., & Gibassier, D. (2018). Environmental management controls at Michelin: How do they link to sustainability? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38, 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2018.1438300
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556363
Bebbington, J. (2007). Accounting for Sustainable Development Performance. Oxford: Elsevier.
Berry, A. J., Coad, A. F., Harris, E. P., Otley, D. T., & Stringer, C. (2009). Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature. British Accounting Review, 41, 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.09.001
Biel, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2007). Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.03.003
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125
Durden, C. (2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 671-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810872969
Feder, M., & Weißenberger, B. E. (2021). Towards a holistic view of CSR-related management control systems in German companies: Determinants and corporate performance effects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126084
Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00123.x
Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9
Johnstone, L. (2018). Theorising and modelling social control in environmental management accounting research. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1422778
Kachelmeier, S. J., Thornock, T. A., & Williamson, M. G. (2016). Communicated values as informal controls: promoting quality while undermining productivity? Contemporary Accounting Research, 33, 1411–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12147
Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596281006
Khalid, B., Shahzad, K., Shafi, M. Q., & Paille, P. (2022). Predicting required and voluntary employee green behavior using the theory of planned behavior. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29, 1300–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2270
Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
March, J. G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Marginson, D. (2009). Value systems as a mechanism for organizational change. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 5, 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325910910932197
Mortensen, T., Fisher, R., & Wines, G. (2012). Students as surrogates for practicing accountants: Further evidence. Accounting Forum, 36, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.06.003
Norris, G., & O'Dwyer, B. (2004). Motivating socially responsive decision making: the operation of management controls in a socially responsive organisation. British Accounting Review, 36, 173-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2003.11.004
Ones, D. S., Wiernik, B. M., Dilchert, S., & Klein, R. (2015). Pro-environmental behavior, in: Wright, J.D. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Elsevier Inc., pp. 82–88.
O'Reilly III, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516. https://doi.org/10.5465/256404
Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 833–48. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833
Paillé, P., & Boiral, O. (2013). Pro-environmental behavior at work: Construct validity and determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 118–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.014
Rezaei, R., Safa, L., Damalas, C. A., & Ganjkhanloo, M. M. (2019). Drivers of farmers' intention to use integrated pest management: Integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. Journal of Environmental Management, 236, 328–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.097
Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Boulianne, E. (2013). Stakeholders’ influence on environmental strategy and performance indicators: A managerial perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24, 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.004
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1984). Internalized values as motivators of altruism, in: Staub, E. (Ed.), Development and Maintenance of Prosocial Behavior. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 229–255.
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D.M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684–707. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667052
Thøgersen, J. (1996). Recycling and morality: A critical review of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 28, 536–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596284006
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2006). The dynamic interaction of personal norms and environment‐friendly buying behavior: A panel study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1758–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00080.x
Tian, Q., & Robertson, J. L. (2019). How and when does perceived CSR affect employees’ engagement in voluntary pro-environmental behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3497-3
Trottier, K., & Gordon, I. M. (2018). Students as surrogates for managers: Evidence from a replicated experiment. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 35, 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1377
Urbany, J. E. (2005). Inspiration and cynicism in values statements. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0188-2
Wesselink, R., Blok, V., & Ringersma, J. (2017). Pro-environmental behaviour in the workplace and the role of managers and organisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1679–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.214
Whelan, T, & Fink, C. (2016). The comprehensive business case for sustainability. Harvard Business Review, October, 21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andson Braga de Aguiar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT: The author retains, without restrictions, the rights to his work.
REUSE RIGHTS: The SCG Journal adopts the Creative Commons License, CC BY-NC, non-commercial attribution according to the Open Access Policy to knowledge adopted by the UFRJ Journal Portal. With this license it is allowed to access, download, copy, print, share, reuse, and distribute the articles, as long as it is for non-commercial use and with the citation of the source, giving due credit of authorship and mentioning the SCG Journal. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or publishers.
AUTHORS' DEPOSIT RIGHTS/SELF ARCHIVING: Authors are encouraged to archive the published version with the link to their article in the SCG Journal in institutional repositories.