Completude e perfeição em Aristóteles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35920/1414-3004.2022v26n1p4-17Abstract
Resumo: A noção de teleion é examinada por Aristóteles no capítulo 16 do livro Delta da Metafísica, o livro em que discrimina os diferentes sentidos que certas noções possuem, todas com interesse filosófico. No tocante à noção de teleion, dois são os sentidos básicos, perfeição e completude, mas um terceiro uso também termina por também se sobressair, que exploraremos aqui em termos de seu uso como superlativo relativo ou absoluto em relação à noção de perfeição. O objetivo do presente texto consiste em estudar a aplicação destes diferentes sentidos na Ética de Aristóteles, na esperança de ganhar alguma luz a respeito de certos temas ainda fortemente controversos.
Palavras-chave: perfeição - completude - felicidade - superlativos absolutos e relativos - ética aristotélica
Abstract: Aristotle examines the notion of teleion in chapter 16 of Metaphysics' Delta, the book in which he discriminates the various senses certain words of philosophical interest have. There are basically two senses of teleion, being complete and being perfect, but a third one is also pinpointed, as this paper endeavours to show when Aristotle considers the use of superlatives corresponding to the notion of perfection, either as relative or as absolute. The aim of this paper is to study the application of these three different senses in Aristotle's Ethics and to see to which extent their distinction can cast some light on certain hotly disputed issues of Aristotelian ethics.
Keywords: perfection - completeness - happiness - absolute and relative superlatives - Aristotle's ethics
Downloads
References
Ackrill, John. (1974) ‘Aristotle on Eudaimonia’, Proceedings of the British Academy 60: 339-359.
Berti, Enrico. (2017) Aristotele – Metafisica. Bari: Editori Laterza.
Bodéüs, Richard e Stevens, Annick. (2014) Aristote – Métaphysique Delta. Paris: Vrin.
Bodéüs, Richard. (2014) Aristote – Œuvres: Éthiques, Politique, Rhétorique, Poétique, Métaphysique. Paris: Pléiade Gallimard.
Bonitz, Hermann. (1992) Commentarius in Aristotelis Metaphysicam. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.
Cope, Edward. (1877) The Rhetoric of Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Destrée, Pierre e Zingano, Marco. (2014) Theoria – studies on the status and meaning of contemplation in Aristotle’s Ethics. Louvain-la-Neuven: Peeters.
Hackforth, Reginald. (1952) Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hardie, William. (1965) ‘The Final Good in Aristotle’s Ethics’, Philosophy 40: 277-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100069709
Hardie, William. (1968) Aristotle’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd. ed.: 1980). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246329.001.0001
Hardie, William. (1979) ‘Aristotle on the best Life for a Man’, Philosophy 54: 35-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100024864
Irwin, Terence. (1985; 1999) Aristotle – Nicomachean Ethics. Indanapolis: Hackett.
Kirwan, Christopher. (1971) Aristotle – Metaphysics Books Γ, Δ and Ε. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rapp, Christof. (2002) Aristoteles Rhetorik. 2 vols. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Ross, David. (1924) Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00263632
Tricot, Jules. (1986) Aristote – La Métaphysique. Paris: Vrin.
Viano, Cristina. (2021) Aristotele – Retorica. Bari: Editori Laterza.
White, Stephen. (1990) ‘Is Aristotelian Happiness a Good Life or the Best Life’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy VIII: 103-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198242864.003.0004
Zingano, Marco. (2017) Aristóteles – Ethica Nicomachea V 1-15 Tratado da Justiça. São Paulo: Odysseus Editora.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marco Zingano

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Analytica. Journal of Philosophy is an open-access scientific journal licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license. This means that its content can be copied and redistributed in any medium or format for any purpose provided the following requirements are met: proper credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and it is indicated if any changes were made. Legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from exercising rights granted by the license shall not be applied. In the case of any transformation or adaptation of the content, the new material cannot be distributed.
This statement aligns with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.