Xenofonte e sua psicologia da Philotimía

Autor/innen

  • Rodrigo Illarraga Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17074/cpc.v1i41.38975

Schlagworte:

Xenofonte, Psicologia, Política, Socráticos, Philotimía

Abstract

No presente artigo defendemos a ideia de que Xenofonte promove um esquema psicológico, a respeito dos governantes, que coloca em primeiro plano a philotimía, o desejo pela honra, de ser honrado e ser elogiado – sobretudo na Ciropédia e no Hierão. Sustentamos que existem dois tipos dephilotimía, uma negativa e uma positiva: a primeira está relacionada com o desejo de ser honrado sem se importar com as consequências, enquanto a segunda está vinculada às consequências das boas ações realizadas para a sociedade. Este último tipo de philotimíaestá marcado pela sophrosyne, uma virtude xenofôntica por excelência. Não obstante, a inovação da perspectiva de Xenofonte está no fato da philotimíapositiva promover, ao mesmo tempo, recompensas ao indivíduo e a sociedade, em um esquema onde o egoísmo e o interesse comunal se retroalimentam.

Literaturhinweise

ALEXIOU, E. Competitive Values in Isocrates and Xenophon, Trends in classics, 10.1, 114-133, 2018.

AZOULAY, V. Xénophon et les grâces de pouvoir. Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne, 2004.

BANDINI, M.; DORION, L.-A. Xénophon, Mémorables. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2000.

BIONDI, E. La peur du tyran das le Hiéron de Xénophon: un cas de psychanalyse qui ne dit pas son nom. In: COIN-LONGERAY, S.; VALLAT, D. (eds.). Peurs antiques. Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne, 2015, p. 163-172.

BEVILACQUA, F. F. Seduzione e potere nella Ciropedia e nell' Economico di Senofonte. In: BENEDETTI, F.; GRANDONNI, S (Ed.). Studi di Filologia e tradizione greca in memoria di Aristide Colonna. Napoli, 2003, p. 131-140.

_____. Kalokagathía e kaloi kagathoi nelle opere socratiche di Senofonte (Memorabili, Economico, Simposio), Magazzino di filosofia, 32, p. 1-50, 2018.

BRANCACCI, A. Episteme and Phronesis in Antisthenes, Méthexis, 18, p.7-28, 2005.

_____. Sull' etica di Antistene. In: ROSSETTI, L.; STAVRU, A. (Eds.). Socratica 2008: Studies in Ancient Socratic Literatura. Bari: Levante editori, 2010, p. 89-118.

_____. Memorabili di Senofonte. Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, 2010.

_____. Introduzione al pensiero político di Antistene. In: STAVRU, A.; DE LUISE, F. (Eds.). Socratica III: Studies on Socrates, the Socratics and the Ancient Socratic Literature. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2013, p. 29-40.

BREITENBACH, H.R. Historiographische Anschauungsformen Xenophons. Freiburg: diss. Bassel, 1950.

BUXTON, R. Xenophon on Leadership: Commanders as Friends. In: FLOWER, M. (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon. London; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017, p. 323-337.

CARTLEDGE, P. The Socratics Sparta and Rousseau's. In: HODKINSON, S.; POWELL, A. (Ed.). Sparta: New Perspectives. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 2009, p. 311-338.

CHRISTESEN, P. Xenophon's Cyropaedia and Military Reform in Sparta, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 126, p. 47-65, 2006.

CLASSEN, J. Xenophons Darstellung der Sophistik und der Sophisten, Hermes, 112, p. 154-167, 1984.

DANZIG, G. The Best of the Achaemenids: Benevolence, Self-Interest and the ‘Ironic’ Reading of Cyropaedia. In: TUPLIN, Christopher; HOBDEN, Fiona (Ed.). Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2012, p. 499-539.

DECLEVA CAIZZI, P. Antisthenis fragmenta. Milano: Cisalpino, 1966.

DUE, B. The Cyropaedia: Xenophon's Aims and Methods. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1989.

EDMUNDS, L. Socrates and the 'Royal Art' (Basilike Techne), Teoria Politica, Nuova Serie, V, p. 77-99, 2015.

GRAY, V. Xenophon's Hiero and the Meeting of the Wise Man and Tyrant in Greek Literature, CQ, New Series, 36, p.115-123, 1986.

_____. Xenophon's Mirror of Princes. Reading the Reflections. Oxford, 2011.

_____. Xenophon eudaimonía. In: DE LUISE, F.; STAVRU, A. On Socrates, the Socratics, and the Ancient Socratic Literature. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2013).

GRIBLLE, D. Alcibiades and Athens. A Study in Literary Presentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

HIGGINS, W. E. Xenophon the Athenian: The Problem of the Individual and the Society of the Polis. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1977.

HUMBLE, N. Xenophon's View of Sparta (Dissertation). Ontario: McMaster University, 1997.

_____. The Agesilaos and the genre of encomium. In: POWELL, A.; RICHER, N. (eds.) Xenophon and Sparta. London/Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 2020, p. 291-317.

ILLARRAGA, R. Los modos de la Corte. La Formación Meda de Ciro en Ciropedia, Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 73, p. 1607-1642, 2017.

_____. Note sulla forme della monarchia in Senofonte, Magazino di Filosofia, 32, p.50-60, 2018a.

_____. Enkráteia y gobierno. El gobernante insensato de Aristipo y su aparición en Ciropedia, Méthexis, 30, p. 1-30, 2018b.

JOHNSON, D. Aristippus at the Crossroads: The Politics of Pleasure in Xenophon' s Memorabilia, Polis, 26, p. 204-222, 2009.

JOHNSTONE, S. Virtuous Toil, Vicious Work: Xenophon on Aristocratic Style, Classical Philology, 89, p. 219-40, 1994.

KEIM, B.D. Honor and the Art of Xenophontic Leadership, Histos Supplement 5, p. 121-162, 2016.

_____. Xenophon’s Hipparchikos and the Athenian Embrace of Citizen Philotimia, Pólis, 35, p. 499-522, 2018.

LU, H. Xenophon's Theory of Moral Education. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Pub, 2015.

LUCCIONI, J. Xénophon. Hiéron. Paris; Presses Universitaires de France, 1947.

_____. Xénophon et le Socratisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1953.

MANES, E. L' Agesilao di Senofonte. Tra commiato ed encomio. Milano: Edizioni Universitaire Jaca, 1992.

MÁRSICO, C. Los filósofos socráticos. Testimonios y fragmentos I. Megáricos y Cirenaicos. Buenos Aires: Losada, 2013.

_____. Los filósofos socráticos. Testimonios y fragmentos: Antístenes, Fedón, Esquines y Simón. Buenos Aires: Losada, 2014.

MÁRSICO, C.; ILLARRAGA, R.; MARZOCCA, P. Jenofonte/ Pseudo-Jenofonte., La constitución de los lacedemonios, Hierón, La constitución de los atenienses. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2017.

MORRISON, D. Tyrannie et royauté selon le Socrate de Xénophon, Les Études philosophiques, 69, p. 177-192, 2004.

_____. Remarques sur la psychologie morale de Xénophon. In: NARCY, M.; TORDESILLAS, A. (Eds.). Xénophon et Sócrate. Paris: Vrin, 2008, p. 11-28.

NADON, C. Xenophon's Prince. Republic and Empire in the Cyropaedia. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2001.

NESTLE, W. Xenophon un die Sophistik, Philologus, 94, p. 31-50, 1941.

NORTH, H. Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966.

NOUSSIA, M. Redefining Use, Expenditure and Exchange of Private Wealth: The Socratic Model, Antisthenes and the Cynics, Revue interdisciplinaire sur la Grèce ancienne, 19, p. 319-333, 2016.

OCCHIPINTI, E. Philia and Utilitarism in Plato and Xenophon, Sileno, 42, p. 91-110, 2016.

PANGLE, L. S. Xenophon on the Psychology of Supreme Political Ambition, American Political Science Review, 11, p. 308-321, May 2017.

PATZER, A. Antisthenes der Sokratiker: Das literarische Werk un die Philosophie, dargestellt am Katalog der Schrifter. Dissertation, Heidelberg University, 1970.

POMEROY, S. Xenophon Economicus. A Social and Historical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

PRINCE, P. Antisthenes of Athens: Texts, Translations, and Commentary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015.

SANDRIDGE, N. Loving Humanity, Learning, and Being Honored. The Foundations of Leadership in Xenophon's Education of Cyrus. Princeton: Center of Hellenic Studies, 2012.

SEVIERI, R. The Imperfect Hiero: Xenophon’s Hiero as the (Self-)Taming of a Tyrant. In: TUPLIN, C. (Ed.). Xenophon and His World. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2004, p. 277-289.

STOLL, O. For the Glory of Athens: Xenophon’s Hipparchikos Logos, a Technical Treatise and Instruction Manual on Ideal Leadership, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43, p. 250-257, 2012.

STURZ, F. Lexicon Xenophonteum I. Leipzig: Nabu Press, 1964 [original de 1801].

TAKAKJY, L. Xenophon the Literary Critic: The Poetics and Politics of Praise in Hiero, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 57, p. 49-73, 2017.

TAMIOLAKI, M. Emotion and Persuasion in Xenophon's Cyropaedia. Phoenix, 70, p. 40-63, 2016.

_____. Athenian Leaders in Xenophon's Memorabilia, Histos, Supplement 5, p. 1-49, 2016b.

TATUM, J. Xenophon’s Imperial Fiction. On the Education of Cyrus. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.

TSOUNA, V. Cyrenaics and Epicureans on Pleasure and the Good Life: The Original Debate and Its Later Revivals. In: WEISSER, S.; THALER, N. (Eds.). Strategies of Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Leiden; Boston, 2016, p. 113-49.

TUPLIN, C. Xenophon, Sparta and the Cyropaedia. In: POWELL, A.; HODKINSON, S. (Ed.). The Shadow of Sparta. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 1994, p. 127-182.

URSTAD, K. Aristippus and freedom in Xenophon's Memorabilia, Praxis, 2, p. 41-55, 2008.

WHITEHEAD, D. Competitive Outlay and Community Profit. Philotimia in Democratic Athens, Classica et Medievalia, 34, p. 55-74, 1983.

_____. The Demes of Attica, 508/7 - ca. 250 B.C: A Political and Social Study. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.

VILLAR, F. The uses of sophistés in Xenophon. In: MÁRSICO, C.; LOPES, D.R.N. (Ed.). Xenophon Philosopher: Ethics and Argumentation. Bern: Peter Lang (forthcoming)

VRIES, G de. Sophrosúne en grec classique, Mnemosyne, 11, p. 81-101, 1943.

ZILIOLI, U. The Cyrenaics. Durham: Acumen Publishing, 2014.

Veröffentlicht

2021-08-30

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Artigos