Spill-around in Mercosur in the 2000s: the development of channels for civil society participation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51861/ded.dmvdo.2.m.016Palabras clave:
Regionalism, Mercosur, Civil Society, Participation.Resumen
The aim of this article is to assess whether the institutional changes implemented in Mercosur during the 2000s impacted the political dynamics of the bloc. We argue that they were not able to alter the intergovernmental logic neither the national vision of regional integration that were established since Mercosur’s foundation. Therefore, we identified the occurrence of spill-around in Mercosur in the 2000s. This article seeks to contribute to a broaden understanding of Mercosur in the 2000s, especially facing the optimism and overestimate that involves Mercosur's channels for civil society participation in the public and academic debate.
Descargas
Citas
AGUERRE, M. J.; ARBOLEYA, I. Estrategias para un Mercosur ciudadano. In: CAETANO, G. (Org.). . La reforma institucional del Mercosur: del diagnóstico a las propuestas. Montevideo: CEFIR, 2009. .
ANNETT, I. Historical Institutionalism as a Regional Integration Theory. Fifth Pan European Conference, n. First Draft, 2010.
BOTTO, M. La integración regional en América Latina : Quo Vadis? : el Mercosur desde una perspectiva sectorial comparada. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2015.
BOTTO, M. Los nuevos regionalismos y la acción colectiva trasnacional. Perfiles latinoamericanos: revista de la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede México, n. 25, p. 9–42, 2004.
BRICEÑO RUIZ, J. La integracíon regional en América Latina y el Caribe: procesos históricos y realidades comparadas. Mérida: Codepre, 2011.
BRICEÑO RUIZ, J. New left governments, civil society and constructing a social dimension in Mercosur. In: CANNON, B.; KIRBY, P. (Org.). . Globalization, democratization ans state-civil society relations in left-led Latin America. New York: Zed Books, 2012. .
BRICEÑO RUIZ, J. O Regionalismo Latino-americano depois do Regionalismo Aberto: novos eixos, novas estratégias, modelos diversos. In: CARMO, C. A. DO et al. (Org.). . Relaões Internacionais: olhares cruzados. Brasília: FUNAG, 2013. .
BUDINI, T. F. Encontros com o Mercosul : a atuação de organizações da sociedade civil brasileira na integração regional. 2015. 160 f. Universidade de São Paulo, 2015.
CEPAL. El regionalismo abierto en América Latina y el Caribe: la integración económica al servicioa de la transformación productiva con equidad. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, 1994.
DABÈNE, O. Consistency and Resilience through Cycles of Repoliticization. In: RIGGIROZZI, P.; TUSSIE, D. (Org.). . The Rise of Post-hegemonic Regionalism: The Case ofLatin America. New York: Springer, 2012. .
DABÈNE, O. The Politics of Regional Integration in Latin America: Theoretical and Comparative Explorations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009.
ETZIONI, A. The epigenesis of Political Communities at the international level. In: ROSENAU, J. (Org.). . International Politics and Foreign Policy. New York: The Fress Press, 2004. .
GARDINI, G. L. The Origins of Mercosur: Democracy and Regionalization in South America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2010.
HOCHSTETLER, K. Multi-Level Governance and Social Movements in Mercosur. 2007, Chicago: [s.n.], 2007.
HUNT, S. Rethinking the Politics of the Shift Left in Latin America: Towards a Relational Approach. Bulletin of Latin American Research, v. 35, n. 4, p. 437–451, 2016.
KIRBY, P.; CANNON, B. Globalization, democratization ans state-civil society relations in left-led Latin America. In: CANNON, B.; KIRBY, P. (Org.). . Civil Society ans the State in Left led Latin America: Challenges and Limitations to Democratization. New York: Zed Books, 2012. .
LIEVESLEY, G.; LUDLAM, S. Reclaiming Latin America: experiments in radical social democracy. New York: Zed Books, 2009.
LOWNDES, V.; ROBERTS, M. Why Institutions Matter: The new institutionalism in Political Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013.
MALAMUD, A. Conceptos, teorías y debates sobre la integración regional. Norteamérica, v. 6, n. 2, p. 219–249, 2011.
MALAMUD, A. La diplomacia presidencial y los pilares institucionalis del Mercosur: un examen Empírico. Relaciones Internacionalis, n. 15, 2010.
MALAMUD, A. Presidential diplomacy and the institutional underpinnings of MERCOSUR: An empirical examination. Latin American Research Review, v. 40, n. 1, p. 138–164, 2005.
MALAMUD, A.; DRI, C. Spillover Effects and Supranational Parliaments: The Case of Mercosur. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research, v. 19, n. 2, p. 224–238, 2013.
MALAMUD, A.; GARDINI, G. L. Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and its Lessons. International Spectator, v. 47, n. 1, p. 116–133, 2012.
MARIANO, K. P. Regionalismo na América do Sul: um novo esquema de análise e a experiênia do Mercosul. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2015.
MARIANO, K. P.; BRESSAN, R. N.; LUCIANO, B. T. A comparative reassessment of regional parliaments in Latin America: Parlasur, Parlandino and Parlatino. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, v. 60, n. 1, 2017.
MARIANO, M. P. A estrutura institucional do Mercosul. São Paulo: Aduaneiras, 2000.
MARTINS, J. R. V. Mercosul: a dimensão social e participativa. In: NETO, W. A. D. N. (Org.). . O Brasil e as novas dimensões da integração regional. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA, 2014. .
MITRANY, D. The Functionalist Alternative. In: WILLIAMS, P.; GOLDSTEIN, D. M.; SHAFRITZ, J. M. (Org.). . Classic Readings of International Relations. New York: Heartcourt Brace College Publishers, 1994. .
NIEMANN, A.; SCHMITTER, P. C. Neofunctionalism. In: WIENER, A.; DIEZ, T. (Org.). . European Integration Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. .
PHILLIPS, N. Regionalist governance in the new political economy of development: “Relaunching” the Mercosur. Third World Quarterly, v. 22, n. 4, p. 565–583, 2001.
PIERSON, P. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
RAMANZINI JUNIOR, H.; LUCIANO, B. T. Regional (dis)integration beyond governments : A comparison in social and civil society participation between Mercosur and SADC. International Area Studies Review, p. 1–17, 2021.
RIGGIROZZI, P.; TUSSIE, D. The Rise of Post-hegemonic Regionalism: The Case ofLatin America. New York: Springer, 2012.
SANAHUJA, J. A. Del “regionalismo abierto” al “regionalismo post-liberal”. Crisis y cambio en la integración regional en América Latina. Anuario de la Integración Regional de América Latina y el Gran Caribe, v. 7, 2009.
SANCHEZ, M. R. É possível pensar em sociedade civil no Mercosul? Cena Internacional, v. 9, n. 1, 2007.
SCHMITTER, P. C. A Revised Theory of Regional Integration. International Organization, v. 24, n. 4, p. 836–868, 1970.
SCHMITTER, P. C. Defining, Explaining and, then, Exploiting the Elusive Concept of “Governance”. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, v. 12, n. 4, p. 547–567, 2019.
VIGEVANI, T. Mercosul: impactos para trabalhadores e sindicatos. São Paulo: LTr, 1998.
