Avaliação de Desempenho de Gestão de Recursos Humanos no Setor Público
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21446/scg_ufrj.v0i0.19644Keywords:
Avaliação de Desempenho. Recursos Humanos. Setor Público. Revisão da Literatura.Abstract
A orientação de serviços com foco nos resultados passou a ser adotada no setor público por meio de práticas de gestão estratégica como a Avaliação de Desempenho (AD) de Recursos Humanos (RH) para aprimorar a eficiência da prestação de serviços públicos. Assim, esta pesquisa tem como objetivo analisar as características das publicações científicas, em língua inglesa, que abordam o tema referente à Avaliação de Desempenho de Recursos Humanos no setor público, para gerar conhecimento e identificar lacunas e possibilidades de contribuições para futuras pesquisas. Trata-se de um estudo de abordagem qualitativa, feito por meio da seleção e análise bibliográfica de artigos científicos com base na ferramenta Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (Proknow-C). Por meio da análise do Portfólio, composto por 21 artigos, foram encontrados estes resultados: evidenciação da motivação como a principal função da Avaliação de Desempenho de Recursos Humanos do setor público; falta de vinculação dos indicadores às estratégias da organização e ao ambiente onde essa está inserida; concentração das pesquisas na etapa de design do Sistema de AD, impossibilitando o feedback e o aprendizado, tanto por parte dos servidores, quanto dos gestores de RH; e geração de oportunidades de pesquisa para teóricos e desafios para gestores com base na identificação de falhas no processo de Avaliação de Desempenho. Portanto, as pesquisas precisam avançar para a análise dos processos necessários para o funcionamento do Sistema de Avaliação de Desempenho de Recursos Humanos no setor público, de forma a evoluir para os estágios de implementação, uso e revisão, preferencialmente com a participação de todos os stakeholders.
References
ABU-DOLEH, J.; WEIR, D. Dimensions of performance appraisal systems in Jordanian private and public organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, v. 18, n. 1, p. 75-84, 2007. [5]
AMIN, M.; ISMAIL, W. K. W.; RASID, S. Z. A.; SELEMANI, R. D. A. The impact of human resource management practices on performance: Evidence from a Public University. The TQM Journal, v. 26, n. 2, 125-142. 2014. [13]
AZMI, I. A. G. Competency-based human resource practices in Malaysian public sector organizations. African Journal of Business Management, v. 4, n. 2, p. 235, 2010. [9]
BEHN, R. D. Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, v. 63, n. 5, p. 586-606, 2003.
BITITCI, U. S.; GARENGO, P.; ATES, A.; NUDURUPATI, S. S. Value of maturity models in performance measurement. International Journal of Production Research, v. 53, n. 10, p. 3062-3085, 2015.
BITITCI, U.; GARENGO, P.; DÖRFLER, v.; NUDURUPATI, S. Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 14, n. 3, p. 305-327, 2012.
BLACKMAN, D.; BUICK, F.; O'DONNELL, M. Why Performance Management Should Not Be Like Dieting. Australian Journal of Public Administration, v. 76, n. 4, p. 524-528, 2017. [21]
BOURNE, M.; MILLS, J.; WILCOX, M.; NEELY, A.; PLATTS, K. Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 20, n. 7, p. 754-771, 2000.
CARNEIRO-DA-CUNHA, J. A.; HOURNEAUX JR, F.; CORRÊA, H. L. Evolution and chronology of the organizational performance measurement field. International Journal of Business Performance Management, v. 17, n. 2, p. 223-240, 2016.
CHOONG, K. K. Has this large number of performance measurement publications contributed to its better understanding? A systematic review for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, v. 52, n. 14, p. 4174-4197, 2014.
CONWAY, E.; FU, N., MONKS, K., ALFES, K.; BAILEY; C. Demands or resources? The relationship between HR practices, employee engagement, and emotional exhaustion within a hybrid model of employment relations. Human Resource Management, v. 55, n. 5, p. 901-917, 2016. [15]
COOK, J.; CROSSMAN, A. Satisfaction with performance appraisal systems: a study of role perceptions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, v. 19, n. 5, p. 526-541, 2004. [3]
DALEY, D. M.; VASU, M. L. Supervisory perceptions of the impact of public sector personnel practices on the achievement of multiple goals: Putting the strategic into human resource management. The American Review of Public Administration, v. 35, n. 2, p. 157-167, 2005. [4]
DUTRA, A.; RIPOLL-FELIU, V. M.; FILLOL, A. G. ENSSLIN, S. R.; ENSSLIN, L. The construction of knowledge from the scientific literature about the theme seaport performance evaluation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 64, n. 2, p. 243-269, 2015.
FRANCO-SANTOS, M.; KENNERLEY, M.; MICHELI, P.; MARTINEZ, V.; MASON, S.; MARR, B.; GRAY, D.; NEELY, A. Towards a definition of a business performance measurement system. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 27, n. 8, p. 784-801, 2007.
FRENCH, P. E.; GOODMAN, D. An assessment of the current and future state of human resource management at the local government level. Review of Public Personnel Administration, v. 32, n. 1, p. 62-74, 2012. [11]
GHALAYINI, A. M.; NOBLE, J. S. The changing basis of performance measurement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 16, n. 8, p. 63-80, 1996.
HAILESILASIE, G. Determinants of public employees' performance: evidence from Ethiopian public organizations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 58, n. 3, p. 238-253, 2009. [8]
LEBAS, M. J. Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 41, n. 1-3, p. 23-35, 1995.
MAKHUBELA, M.; BOTHA, P. A.; SWANEPOEL, S. Employees' perceptions of the effectiveness and fairness of performance management in a South African public sector institution. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2016. [17]
MANOLOPOULOS, D. An evaluation of employee motivation in the extended public sector in Greece. Employee Relations, v. 30, n. 1, p. 63-85, 2008. [7]
MELNYK, S. A.; BITITCI, U.; PLATTS, K.; TOBIAS, J.; ANDERSEN, B. Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? Management Accounting Research, v. 25, n. 2, p. 173-186, 2014.
MELTON, E. K.; MEIER, K. J. For the want of a nail: The interaction of managerial capacity and human resource management on organizational performance. Public Administration Review, v. 77, n. 1, p. 118-130, 2017. [19]
MICHELI, P.; MARI, L. The theory and practice of performance measurement. Management Accounting Research, v. 25, n. 2, p. 147-156, 2014.
MOSTAFA, A. M. S.; GOULDâ€WILLIAMS, J. S.; BOTTOMLEY, P. Highâ€performance human resource practices and employee outcomes: the mediating role of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, v. 75, n. 5, p. 747-757, 2015. [14]
NEELY, A.; GREGORY, M.; PLATTS, K. Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 15, n. 4, p. 80-116, 1995.
NEELY, A. The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 19, n. 2, p. 205-228, 1999.
NUDURUPATI, S. S; BITITCI, U. S.; KUMAR, V.; CHAN, F.T. State of the art literature review on performance measurement. Computers & Industrial Engineering, v. 60, n. 2, p. 279-290, 2011.
RICHARDSON, R. J. Pesquisa Social: métodos e técnicas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
SELDEN, S. C.; JACOBSON, W.; AMMAR, S. H.; WRIGHT, R. H. A new approach to assessing performance of state human resource management systems: A multi-level fuzzy rule-based system. Review of Public Personnel Administration, v. 20, n. 3, p. 58-74, 2000. [1]
SONGSTAD, N. G.; LINDKVIST, I.; MOLAND, K. M. CHIMHUTU, V.; BLYSTAD, A. Assessing performance enhancing tools: experiences with the open performance review and appraisal system (OPRAS) and expectations towards payment for performance (P4P) in the public health sector in Tanzania. Globalization and Health, v. 8, n. 1, p. 33, 2012. [10]
SRIVASTAVA, A. P.; DHAR, R. L. Impact of Leader member exchange, human resource management practices and psychological empowerment on extra role performances: the mediating role of organisational commitment. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 65, n. 3, p. 351-377, 2016. [16]
TANWIR, M.; CHAUDHRY, A. Reforming a broken system: a new performance evaluation system for Pakistan civil servants. Pakistan Development Review, v. 55, n. 1, p. 49, 2016. [18]
TER BOGT, H. J. Performance evaluation styles in governmental organizations: How do professional managers facilitate politicians' work? Management Accounting Research, v. 14, n. 4, p. 311-332, 2003. [2]
THIEL, G. G.; ENSSLIN, S. R.; ENSSLIN, L. Street Lighting Management and Performance Evaluation: Opportunities and Challenges. Lex Localis, v. 15, n. 2, p. 303, 2017.
VALMORBIDA, S. M. I.; ENSSLIN, S. R. Performance evaluation of university rankings: literature review and guidelines for future research. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, v. 14, n. 4, p. 479-501, 2017.
VAN CAMP, J.; BRAET, J. Taxonomizing performance measurement systems' failures. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 65, n. 5, p. 672-693, 2016.
VAN RINSUM, M.; VERBEETEN, F. H. M. The impact of subjectivity in performance evaluation practices on public sector managers' motivation. Accounting and Business Research, v. 42, n. 4, p. 377-396, 2012. [12]
VERBEETEN, F. H. M. Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 21, n. 3, p. 427-454, 2008. [6]
VERMEEREN, B. Influencing public sector performance: studying the impact of ability-, motivation-and opportunity-enhancing human resources practices on various performance outcomes in the public sector. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 83, n. 4, p. 717-737, 2017. [20]
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT: The author retains, without restrictions, the rights to his work.
REUSE RIGHTS: The SCG Journal adopts the Creative Commons License, CC BY-NC, non-commercial attribution according to the Open Access Policy to knowledge adopted by the UFRJ Journal Portal. With this license it is allowed to access, download, copy, print, share, reuse, and distribute the articles, as long as it is for non-commercial use and with the citation of the source, giving due credit of authorship and mentioning the SCG Journal. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or publishers.
AUTHORS' DEPOSIT RIGHTS/SELF ARCHIVING: Authors are encouraged to archive the published version with the link to their article in the SCG Journal in institutional repositories.