Stop Talking (and Acting) Paradigmatically: Building Bridges Instead of Academic Islands in Accounting

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21446/scg_ufrj.v20i3.55247

Keywords:

Paradigm, Accounting, Multiparadigm, Mainstream.

Abstract

Drawing on Thomas Kuhn’s notion of “paradigm”, this essay critically examines its implications for the accounting discipline and explores the extent to which paradigmatic dominance may constrain pluralistic understandings of accounting. In doing so, the essay aims to contribute to the accounting literature by highlighting the relevance of, and fostering creative engagement with, alternative forms of accounting that acknowledge the complex ways in which accounting is intertwined with society. This essay contributes by reflecting on the question of whether “Is the paradigmatic scientific model possible or even desirable in the accounting discipline?” By doing so, we argue for an accounting community that is aware of paradigmatic dynamics and advocate for scholars to build academic bridges rather than islands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tassiani Aparecida dos Santos, Universidade de São Paulo

stakeholder engagement, diversity in organisations, diversity in decision-making, management accounting, qualitative and critical studies,  narratives, biographies, etc.

References

Assis, J. P. (1993). Kuhn e as ciências sociais. Estudos avançados, 7 (19), 133-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40141993000300004

Burrel, G.; & Morgans, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann.

Caniato, A. M. P. (2005). Resenha: a questão dos paradigmas na psicologia. Psicologia & Sociedade, 17 (3), 82-84. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-71822005000300014

Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 61 (4), 601-632. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/247360

Frezatti, F.; Nascimento, A. R.; & Junqueira, E. (2009). Desenvolvimento da pesquisa em Contabilidade Gerencial: as restrições da abordagem monoparadigmática de Zimmerman. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 20 (49), 6-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772009000100002

Frezatti, F.; Aguiar, A. B.; Wanderley, C. A.; & Malagueño, R. (2015). A pesquisa em contabilidade gerencial no Brasil: desenvolvimento, dificuldades e oportunidades. Revista Universo Contábil, 11 (1), 47-68. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2015147-68

Granlund, M.; & Lukka, K. (2016). Investigating highly established research paradigms: Reviving contextually in contingency theory based management accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 45 (1), 63-80. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.11.003

Hopwood, A. (2002). If only there were simple solutions, but aren’t’: some reflections on Zimmerman’s critique of empirical management accounting research. European Accounting Review, 11 (4), 777-785. DOI: 10.1080/0963818022000047073

Ittner, C. D; & Larcker, D. F. (2001). Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32 (1), 349-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00026-X

Ittner, C. D; & Larcker, D. F. (2002). Empirical managerial accounting research: are we just describing management consulting practice? European Accounting Review, 11 (4), 787-794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818022000047082

Kerlinger, F. N. (1979). Metodologia da pesquisa em ciências sociais: um tratamento conceitual. São Paulo: EPU.

Kuhn, T. S. (2013). A estrutura das revoluções científicas. (12. ed). São Paulo: Perspectiva.

Lukka, K.; & Mouritsen, J. (2002). Homogeneity or heterogeneity of research in management accounting? European Accounting Review, 11 (4), 805-811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818022000047109

Luft, J.; & Shields, M. (2002). Zimmerman`s contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empirical management accounting research. European Accounting Review, 11 (4), 795-803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818022000047091

Lukka, K. (2010). The roles and effects of paradigms in accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 21 (1), 110-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.002

Lourenço, R. L.; & Sauerbronn, F. F. (2016). Revistando possibilidades epistemológicas em contabilidade gerencial: em busca de contribuições de abordagens interpretativas e críticas no Brasil. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 13 (28), 99-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n28p99

Malmi, T. (2010). Reflections on paradigms in action in accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 21 (1), 121-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.003

Merchant, K. A. (2010). Paradigms in accounting research: A view from North America. Management Accounting Research, 21 (1), 116-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.004

Modell, S. (2010). Bridging the paradigm divide in management accounting research: The role of mixed methods approaches. Management Accounting Research, 21 (1), 124-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.005

Popper, K. (1979). A ciência normal e seus perigos. In: Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Org.). A crítica e o desenvolvimento do conhecimento. (p. 115-141). São Paulo: Cultrix/Edusp.

Silva, F. C. C.; Albuquerque, K. S. L. S.; & Gome, S. M. S. (2009). Discussão sobre a controvérsia do paradigma econômico na pesquisa empírica em contabilidade gerencial. Revista Contabilidade Vista & Revista, 20 (4), 87-107. Available in: https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/contabilidadevistaerevista/article/view/717.

Wijaya, R. E.; Ludigdo, U.; Baridwan, Z.; & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2015). Paradigm blurred: Opera cake in management accounting information research. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211 (1), 859-865

Zimmerman, J. L. (2001). Conjectures regarding empirical managerial accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32 (1), 411-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00023-4

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 3 (2025)

Section

Artigos

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Tassiani Aparecida Dos Santos

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

COPYRIGHT: The author retains, without restrictions, the rights to his work.

REUSE RIGHTS: The SCG Journal adopts the Creative Commons License, CC BY-NC, non-commercial attribution according to the Open Access Policy to knowledge adopted by the UFRJ Journal Portal. With this license it is allowed to access, download, copy, print, share, reuse, and distribute the articles, as long as it is for non-commercial use and with the citation of the source, giving due credit of authorship and mentioning the SCG Journal. In such cases, no permission is required from the authors or publishers.

AUTHORS' DEPOSIT RIGHTS/SELF ARCHIVING: Authors are encouraged to archive the published version with the link to their article in the SCG Journal in institutional repositories.