Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets

Gustavo Ferreira de Souza, Lorena Avelina Rojas Gutierrez, Ademir Paceli Barbassa, Luciana Escalante Pereira, Anny Keli Aparecida Alves Cândido, José Marcato Júnior, José Renato Silva de Oliveira, Antonio Conceição Paranhos Filho

Abstract


The particularities of the remote sensing instruments, even when they have the same characteristics, made the images generated, different among themselves. With that in mind, the goals of this work were to analyze the applicability and the limits of detection in the identification of natural targets in different satellite images. The area of study is located in Onda Verde in the state of São Paulo. The natural targets were selected from the analyses taken of the images and in the field trip. The images chosen presented the best contrast with the surroundings and easy to locate in the satellite images. For the digital processing of them the free software gvSIG was used. In this study, data of the mean spatial resolution satellite images were used such as Landsat-5, CBERS-2B e IRS-P6, available in the public domain database of the INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais) and images of high spatial resolution of the satellites RapidEye and WorldView-2. In the mean spatial resolution sensors, the smallest spatial resolutions of the TM and LISS-3 sensors didn't interfered the visualization of the spectral targets analyzed, since the CCD have the higher spatial resolution, it wasn't possible the identification of the selected targets. The high spatial resolution images RapidEye and WorldView-2 showed great levels of details for the land cover, hence the high radiometric resolution of these satellites.

Keywords


Onda Verde city; Remote sensing; Geothecnologies; Orbital images



DOI: https://doi.org/10.11137/2016_1_13_22

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Indexers and Bibliographic Databases

Social Media

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
0.8
2022CiteScore
 
 
24th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
ISSN
ROAD
Diadorim
DOAJ
DRJI
GeoRef
Google Scholar
Latindex
Oasisbr
Redalyc
Twitter
Instagram
Facebook
 Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.