Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets

Authors

  • Gustavo Ferreira de Souza Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Urbana
  • Lorena Avelina Rojas Gutierrez Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Engenharia Hidráulica e Recursos Hídricos, Programa de Pós- Graduação em Saneamento, Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos
  • Ademir Paceli Barbassa Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Urbana
  • Luciana Escalante Pereira Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Laboratório de Geoprocessamento para Aplicações Ambientais
  • Anny Keli Aparecida Alves Cândido Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Laboratório de Geoprocessamento para Aplicações Ambientais
  • José Marcato Júnior Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Laboratório de Geoprocessamento para Aplicações Ambientais
  • José Renato Silva de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Laboratório de Geoprocessamento para Aplicações Ambientais
  • Antonio Conceição Paranhos Filho Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Laboratório de Geoprocessamento para Aplicações Ambientais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11137/2016_1_13_22

Keywords:

Onda Verde city, Remote sensing, Geothecnologies, Orbital images

Abstract

The particularities of the remote sensing instruments, even when they have the same characteristics, made the images generated, different among themselves. With that in mind, the goals of this work were to analyze the applicability and the limits of detection in the identification of natural targets in different satellite images. The area of study is located in Onda Verde in the state of São Paulo. The natural targets were selected from the analyses taken of the images and in the field trip. The images chosen presented the best contrast with the surroundings and easy to locate in the satellite images. For the digital processing of them the free software gvSIG was used. In this study, data of the mean spatial resolution satellite images were used such as Landsat-5, CBERS-2B e IRS-P6, available in the public domain database of the INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais) and images of high spatial resolution of the satellites RapidEye and WorldView-2. In the mean spatial resolution sensors, the smallest spatial resolutions of the TM and LISS-3 sensors didn't interfered the visualization of the spectral targets analyzed, since the CCD have the higher spatial resolution, it wasn't possible the identification of the selected targets. The high spatial resolution images RapidEye and WorldView-2 showed great levels of details for the land cover, hence the high radiometric resolution of these satellites.

Published

2017-02-15

Issue

Section

Article