Pluralidade de ‘políticas’ na economia política da divisão global do trabalho
Schlagworte:
Divisão global do trabalho, liberalismo, nacionalismo, marxismoAbstract
A questão da divisão internacional do trabalho, a base do comércio internacional, está no início do campo da economia política internacional. Afinal, os benefícios e os perigos da divisão do trabalho têm sido discutidos pelo menos desde a descrição detalhada de Adam Smith no século XVIII. Com relação à divisão internacional do trabalho, três paradigmas foram desenvolvidos já no século XIX e ainda orientam o debate sobre a divisão internacional do trabalho atualmente: as "escolas" liberal, nacionalista econômica e marxista. A primeira aceita a divisão internacional do trabalho, a segunda condiciona seus benefícios ao cumprimento de certas condições e a terceira rejeita o modo de divisão do trabalho. Nas últimas décadas, essas visões foram complementadas pela crítica feminista da divisão de trabalho por gênero. A divisão internacional do trabalho é, portanto, um ponto de partida ideal para fornecer uma visão geral das diferentes vertentes da economia política internacional (EPI) e suas respectivas posições políticas sobre o comércio. Ao tomar nota desses paradigmas, este artigo objetiva compreender melhor os debates atuais sobre a política econômica global. Portanto, primeiro apresentarei essas tradições teóricas individualmente para, em uma segunda etapa, compará-las sistematicamente com sua posição em relação à divisão social do trabalho.
Literaturhinweise
Aglietta, M 1979, A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience, New Left Books, London. Original: Aglietta, M 1976, Régulation et crises du capitalisme, Calmann-Levy, Paris.
Altvater, E 1987, Sachzwang Weltmarkt. Verschuldungskrise, blockierte Industrialisierung, ökologische Gefährdung – der Fall Brasilien, VSA, Hamburg.
Amin, S 1976, Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism, Monthly Review Press, New York.
Axelrod, R 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.
Barattieri, A and Cacciatore, M 2020, ‘Self-Harming Trade Policy? Protectionism and Production Networks’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 27630, July.
Belton, K and Mandel, M and Duesterberg, T 2020, “Policies to Enhance the Resilience of US Manufacturing” (September 15, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3693461 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693461.
Bhattacharya, T 2017, Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, Pluto Press, London.
Boccara, P 1973, Études sur le capitalisme monopoliste d’état, sa crise et son issue [A Study of State Monopoly Capitalism, Its Crisis and Its Meaning], Éditions sociales, Paris.
Boserup, E 1970, Women’s Role in Economic Development, Allen & Unwin, London.
Burnell, P 1986, Economic Nationalism in the Third World, Wheatsheaf Press, Brighton.
Carey, H C 1837, Principles of Political Economy: Part the First: Of the Laws of the Production and Distribution of Wealth, Philadelphia.
Cavaghan, R 2017, Making Gender Equality Happen: Knowledge, Change and Resistance in EU Gender Mainstreaming, Taylor & Francis, New York.
Cecchini, P 1988, The European Challenge, 1992: The Benefits of a Single Market, Gower, Aldershot.
Chang, H 2002, Kicking away the ladder. development strategy under historical perspective, Anthem Press, London.
Collins, P H 2019, Intersectionality as critical social theory, Duke University Press, Durham.
Collins, P H 2000, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, 2nd Edition, Routledge, New York.
Crenshaw, K 1989, ‘Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex’ University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 1989, no. 1, pp. 139-167.
Dawson, A 2000, ‘Reassessing Henry Carey (1793-1879): The Problems of Writing Political Economy in Nineteenth-Century America’, Journal of American Studies, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 465-485.
Dos Santos, T 1970, “The Structure of Dependence”, The American Economic Review, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 231–236.
Emmanuel, A 1972, Unequal exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade, New Left Books, New York.
Federici, S 2004, Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation, Autonomedia, New York.
Felbermayr, G J, Heid, B and Lehwald, S 2013, Transatlantic trade and investment partnership (TTIP): Who benefits from a free trade deal? Part 1: Macroeconomic Effects. In: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Ferrier, F 1805, Du gouvernement considéré dans ses rapports avec le commerce ou l’administration commerciale opposée aus économistes du 19e siècle, Perlet, Paris.
Fichte, J G 2012, The Closed Commercial State, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Frank, A G 1967, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil, Monthly Review Press, New York and London.
Fraser, N 2017, “Crisis of Care? On the Social-Reproductive Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism”, in T Bhattacharya und L Vogel (eds.), Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, Pluto Press, London, pp. 21-36.
Fuller, C and Phelps, N A 2018, “Revisiting the Multinational Enterprise in Global Production Networks”, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 139–161.
Gereffi, G 1994, “Capitalism, Development and Global Commodity Chain” in L Sklair (ed.), Capitalism and Development, Routledge, London, pp. 211–231.
Germann, J 2021, Unwitting Architect, German Primacy and the Origins of Neoliberalism, Stanford University Press, Redwood City.
Gilpin, R 1987, The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Gilpin, R 1973, The multinational corporation and the national interest, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Gilpin, R 1975, U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investments, Basic Books, New York.
Grossman, G and Helpman, E 1995, “The Politics of Free Trade Agreements”, American Economic Review, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 667-690.
Haddad, L, Brown, L R, Richter, A and Smith, L 1995, “The gender dimensions of economic adjustment policies: Potential interactions and evidence to date”, World Development, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 881-896.
Heinrich, M 2012, An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital, New York University Press, New York.
Helleiner, E 2021, “The Diversity of Economic Nationalism”, New Political Economy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 229-238.
Helleiner, E 2018, “Sun Yat-sen as a Pioneer of International Development”, History of Political Economy, vol. 50, no. S1, pp. 76–93.
Herr, H and Priewe, J 2005, The Macroeconomics of Development and Poverty Reduction: Strategies Beyond the Washington Consensus, Nomos, Baden-Baden.
Kautsky, K 1914, “Imperialism and the War” trans. William E. Bohn, International Socialist Review, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 282-286.
Keohane, R O 1984, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Kindleberger, C P 1973/1986, The World in Depression: 1929–1939, University of California Press, Berkley, revised and enlarged edition.
Krasner, S D 1982, “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables”, International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 185-205.
Krugman, P (ed.) 1986, Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Krugman, P, Obstfeld, M and Melitz, M 2018, International Economics: Theory and Policy (Eleventh Edition), Pearson Education, London.
Lal, D 1983, The Poverty of ‘Development Economics’, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
Lenin, V I 1916a/1964, “Imperialism and the Split in Socialism”, in Lenin Collected Works, Volume 23, Progress Publishers, Moscow, pp. 105-120.
Lenin, V I 1916b/2000, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, with Introduction by Prabhat Patnaik, LeftWord Books, New Delhi.
Levy, D 2008, “Political contestation in global production networks” Academy of Management Review, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 943–963.
Lewis, W A 1966, Development Planning: The Essentials of Economic Policy, Harper & Row, New York.
Lipietz, A 1985, The Enchanted World: Inflation, Credit and the Global Crises, Verso, London and New York.
List, F 1841/1909, The National System of Political Economy by Friedrich List, trans. S S Lloyd, with an Introduction by J. Shield Nicholson, Longmans, Green and Co., London.
Luxemburg, R 1912/2003, The Accumulation of Capital, Routledge, Abingdon.
Malesky, E, and Milner, H V 2021, “Fostering Global Value Chains Through International Agreements: Evidence from Vietnam”, Economics & Politics, vol. February 2021, pp. 1-40, DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12186.
Maliniak, D and Tierney, M J 2009, ‘The American school of IPE’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 6–33.
Mandel, E 1972/1975, Late Capitalism, New Left Books, London.
Manoilescu, M 1931, The Theory of Protection and International Trade, P.S. King & Son, London.
Marx, K 1848, “Rede über die Frage des Freihandels”, in Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus beim ZK der SED (Hrsg.), 1971: Karl Marx/Friedrich Engels: Werke, Band 4, Berlin, pp. 444-458.
Marx, K 1894, “Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie”, in Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus beim ZK der SED (Hrsg.), 1986: Karl Marx/Friedrich Engels: Werke, Band 25, Berlin.
MEW, Marx, K, Engels, F, “Gesamtausgabe, hgg.v.” in IML beim ZK der SED, Berlin (DDR) 1956ff.
Mies, M 1986, Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labor, Zed Books Ltd., London and Atlantic Heights.
Milner, H V and Judkins, B 2004, “Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy?”, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 95-119.
Neusüß, C 1972, Imperialismus und Weltmarktbewegung des Kapitals, Verlag Politladen, Erlangen.
Nye, J V C 2007, War, Wine, and Taxes: The Political Economy of Anglo-French Trade, 1689–1900, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Ohmae, K 1990, The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy, Harper Business, New York.
Otsubo, S T and Otchia, C S 2021, Designing Integrated Industrial Policies Volume II: For Inclusive Development in Africa and Asia, Routledge, London.
Patnaik, U and Patnaik, P 2016, A Theory of Imperialism, Tulika Books, New Delhi.
Peterson, V S 1992, “Security and Sovereign States: What Is at Stake in Taking Feminism Seriously?”, in V S Peterson (ed.) Gendered States. Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 31-64.
Peterson, V S and Runyan, A S 1999, Global Gender Issues, Westview Press, Boulder.
Prebisch, R 1950, The Economic Development of Latin America and its principal problems, United Nations Department of Economic Affairs, New York.
Rodrik, D 2004, Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rosenau, J N 1995, “Governance in the Twenty-first Century”, Global Governance, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13-43.
Rostow, W W 1960, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Scherrer, C 2021a, America Second? Die USA, China und der Weltmarkt, Bertz & Fischer, Berlin.
Scherrer, C 2021b, “Power Relations in Global Agricultural Value Chains”, in I D Karatepe and C Scherrer (eds.), The Phantom of Upgrading in Agricultural Supply Chains: A Cross-Country, Cross-Crop Comparison of Smallholders, NOMOS, Stuttgart, pp. 261-296.
Scherrer, C and Abernathy, E 2017, “Trump’s Trade Policy Agenda”, Intereconomics, vol. 52, vol. 6, pp. 364-369.
Schwenken, H 2018, “Intersectional Migration Regime Analysis: Explaining Gender-Selective Labor Emigration Regulations”, in A Pott, C Rass and F Wolff (eds.), Was ist ein Migrationsregime? What is a Migration Regime?, Springer, Wiesbaden, pp. 207–224.
Seguino, S 1997, “Export-Led Growth and the Persistence of Gender Inequality in the Newly Industrialized Countries”, in J Rives and M Yousefi, Economic Dimensions of Gender Inequality: A Global Perspective, Praeger, London, pp. 11–34.
Selwyn, B 2015, “Twenty-first-century International Political Economy: A class-relational perspective”, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 513–537. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114556659.
Short J L, Toffel M W and Hugill A R 2020, “Improving Working Conditions in Global Supply Chains: The Role of Institutional Environments and Monitoring Program Design” ILR Review, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 873-912, doi:10.1177/0019793920916181.
Silver, B 2003, Forces of Labour: Workers Movements and Globalization Since 1870, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Streeck, W and Yamamura, K (eds.) 2001, The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Szporluk, R 1988, Communism and Nationalism: Karl Marx versus Friedrich List, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Tejani, S and Milberg, W 2016, “Global Defeminization? Industrial Upgrading and Manufacturing Employment in Developing Countries”, Feminist Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 24-54, doi: 10.1080/13545701.2015.1120880.
Thurow, L C 1985, The Zero-Sum Solution: Building a World-Class American Economy, Simon & Schuster, New York.
Tickner, J A 1992, Gender in International Relations, Columbia University Press, New York.
Tribe, K 1995, Strategies of Economic Order: German Economic Discourse, 1750-1950, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Van Staveren, I, Elson, D, Grown, C and Cagatay, N 2007, The Feminist Economics of Trade, Routledge, New York.
Wallerstein, I 1982, The Capitalist World-Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wendt, A 1992, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics”, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425.
Williamson, J 1990, The Progress of Policy Reform in Latin America, Institute for International Economics, Washington D.C.
Yat-sen, S 1922, The International Development of China, G. Putnam’s Sons, New York.
Young, B 2001, “The ‘Mistress’ and the ‘Maid’ in the Globalized Economy”, Socialist Register, Working Classes: Global Realities, vol. 37, pp. 315-327.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2023 Oikos
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
