REFLEXIONES SOBRE LA APLICACIÓN DE LA INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN LA ADMINISTRACIÓN DE JUSTICIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21875/tjc.v6i0.44567Palavras-chave:
inteligencia artificial, administración de justicia, juez-robot, decisiones judiciales automatizadasResumo
Los avances en las tecnologías de big data, machine learning y procesamiento del lenguaje natural están posibilitando el desarrollo de sistemas inteligentes capaces de realizar un creciente número de tareas jurídicas. Ello ha suscitado un intenso debate académico acerca de la posibilidad de automatizar determinadas actividades judiciales. Incluso, algunos gobiernos han anunciado ya la puesta en marcha de jueces-robot para resolver automáticamente determinados tipos de reclamaciones. En este contexto, el trabajo pretende ofrecer una serie de reflexiones para un enfoque pragmático de las posibilidades de aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en la administración de justicia, intentando exponer la diversidad y complejidad de las cuestiones implicadas en aquel debate. Un debate que en no pocas ocasiones es planteado en términos poco realistas, excesivamente reduccionistas y simplificadores.Referências
ALARIE, Benjamin. “The path of the law: Towards legal singularity”. University of Toronto Law Journal, v. 66, n. 4, 2016, p. 443-455.
ANZALONE, Angelo. “¿Robotización judicial? Breves reflexiones críticas”. Journal of Ethics and Legal Technologies, v. 1, n. 1, 2019, p. 95-114.
BARRIO ANDRÉS, Moisés (dir.). Legal Tech. La transformación digital de la abogacía. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer, 2019.
BATTELLI, Ettore. “La decisión robótica: algoritmos, interpretación y justicia predictiva”. Revista de Derecho privado, n. 38, 2020, p. 45-86.
BEIJING INTERNET COURT. White Paper on the application of Internet technology in judicial practice. Beijing: August 17, 2019.
BELLOSO MARTÍN, Nuria. “Los desafíos iusfilosóficos de los usos de la inteligencia artificial en los sistemas judiciales: a propósito de la decisión judicial robótica vs. decisión judicial humana”. En: IDEM (dir.). Sociedad plural y nuevos retos del Derecho. Cizur Menor (Navarra): Aranzadi, 2021, p. 327-401.
BOIX PALOP, Andrés; COTINO HUESO, Lorenzo (coord.). Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, nº 50. Monográfico sobre “Derecho Público, derechos y transparencia ante el uso de algoritmos, inteligencia artificial y big data”. 2019.
BRKAN, Maja. “Do algorithms rule the world? Algorithmic decision-making and data protection in the framework of the DGPR and beyond”. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 27, nº 2, 2019, p. 91-121.
CARLEO, Alessandra. (a cura di). Decisione robotica. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2019.
CHEN, Benjamin Minhao; LI, Zhiyu. “How will technology change the face of Chinese justice?” Columbia Journal of Asian Law, vol. 34, nº 1, 2020, p. 1-58.
CORVALÁN, Juan Gustavo. PROMETEA. Inteligencia artificial para transformar organizaciones públicas. Buenos Aires - Bogotá: Editorial Astrea - Editorial Universidad del Rosario, 2019.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS. Unboxing Artificial Intelligence: 10 steps to protect Human Rights. Council of Europe, May 2019.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 2019-2023 Strategy on e-Justice. 2019/C 96/04, 2019a.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. 2019-2023 Action Plan European e-Justice. 2019/C 96/05, 2019b.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Council Conclusions “Access to Justice - seizing the opportunities of digitalization”. 2020/C 342 I/01, 2020.
DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY. Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679. Adopted on 3 October 2017, as last Revised and Adopted on 6 February 2018.
DOSHI - VELEZ, Finale; KORTZ, Mason. Accountability of AI under the Law: the role of explanation. Berkman Klein Center Working Group on Explanation and the Law, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society working paper, 2017.
EDWARDS, Lilian; VEALE, Michael. “Enslaving the algorithm: from a ‘right to explanation’ to a ‘right to better decisions’?”. IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 16, nº 3, 2018, p. 46-54.
ESTÉVEZ, Elsa; LEJARRAGA, Sebastián Linares; FILLOTTRANI, Pablo. PROMETEA. Transformando la Administración de Justicia con herramientas de inteligencia artificial. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, 2020.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Study on the use of innovative technologies in the justice field, 2020.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. COM. (2021) 206 final, 21.4.2021.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR THE EFFICIENCY OF JUSTICE. European Ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment. Council of Europe CEPEJ, 2018.
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, 2020.
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. General Data Protection Regulation. Regulation (UE) 2016/679 of 27 April 2016.
GOODMAN, Bryce; FLAXMAN, Seth. “European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a right to explanation”. ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.08813.pdf. 2016.
KAMINSKI, Margot. “The Right to Explanation, Explained”. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, vol. 34, 2019, p. 189-218.
KURZWEIL, Ray. The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Viking Penguin, 2006.
LUCIANI, Massimo. “La decisione giudiziaria robotica”. Rivista della Asociazione Italiana dei constitucionalisti, nº 3, 2018, p. 872-893.
MALGIERI, Gianclaudio; COMANDÉ, Giovanni. “Why a right to legibility of automated decision-making exists in the General Data Protection Regulation”. International Data Privacy Law, vol. 7, nº 4, 2017, p. 243-265.
MARISSAL, Pierric. “Réforme Belloubet. Des logiciels à la place des juges, mirage de la justice predictive”. l’Humanité, 20 Avril 2018 disponível em: https://www.humanite.fr/reforme-belloubet-des-logiciels-la-place-des-juges-mirage-de-la-justice-predictive-654139
MARTÍNEZ ZORRILLA, David. “El juez artificial: ¿próxima parada?”. Oikonomics, nº 12, 2019.
MASUHARA, David. “Artificial intelligence and adjudication: some perspectives”. Amicus Curiae, n. 11, 2017, p. 2-15.
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE (UK). Transforming our justice system: assisted digital strategy, automatic online conviction and statutory standard penalty, and panel composition in tribunals. Government response Cm 9391, 2017.
NIEVA FENOLL, Jordi. Inteligencia artificial y proceso judicial. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2018.
NIILER, Eric. “Can AI be a fair judge in Court? Stonia thinks so”. Wired, 25-3-2019. disponível em: https://www.wired.com/story/can-ai-be-fair-judge-court-estonia-thinks-so/
PASQUALE, Frank. “A rule of persons, not machines: the limits of legal automation”. The George Washington Law Review, v. 87, n. 1, 2019, p. 1-55.
PÉREZ DAUDÍ, Vicente. “La aplicación de las nuevas tecnologías al proceso: ¿realidad o ficción?”. En: FUENTES SORIANO, Olga (dir.). Era digital, sociedad y Derecho. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020, p. 373-397.
RE, Richard; SOLOW-NIEDERMAN, Alicia. “Developing artificially intelligent justice”. Stanford Technology Law Review, n. 22, 2019, p. 242-289.
RICHARDSON, Rashida; SCHULTZ, Jason; SOUTHERLAND, Vincent. Litigating Algorithms 2019 US Report. AI Now Institute, 2019.
RUBIM, Pedro. “Paths to digital justice: judicial robots, algorithmic decision-making, and due process”. Asian Journal of Law and Society, vol. 7, n. 3, 2020, p. 1-17.
SCHERER, Maxi. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Decision-Making: The Wide Open? Study on the Example of International Arbitration. Queen Mary University of London, School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, Nº 318, 2019.
SOLAR CAYÓN, José Ignacio. “La codificación predictiva: inteligencia artificial en la averiguación procesal de los hechos relevantes”. Anuario de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Alcalá, vol. 11, 2018, p. 75-105.
SOLAR CAYÓN, José Ignacio. La inteligencia artificial jurídica. Cizur Menor (Navarra): Aranzadi, 2019.
SOLAR CAYÓN, José Ignacio. “Inteligencia artificial en la justicia penal: los sistemas algorítmicos de evaluación de riesgos”. En: SOLAR CAYÓN, José Ignacio (ed.). Dimensiones éticas y jurídicas de la inteligencia artificial en el marco del Estado de Derecho. Alcalá de Henares (Madrid): Universidad de Alcalá - Defensor del Pueblo, 2020, pp. 125-172.
SOURDIN, Tania. “Judge v. Robot? Artificial Intelligence and judicial decision-making”. UNSW Law Journal, vol. 41, n. 4, 2018, p. 1114-1133.
THE LAW SOCIETY OF ENGLAND AND WALES. Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System. The Law Society Commission on the Use of Algorithms in the Justice System, 2019.
VOLOKH, Eugene. “Chief Justice Robots”. Duke Law Journal, vol. 68, 2019, p. 1135-1192.
WACHTER, Sandra; MITTELSTADT, Brent; FLORIDI, Luciano. “Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation”. International Data Privacy Law, vol. 7, nº 2, 2017, p. 76-99.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Os autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-CompartilhaIgual 3.0 Brasil.
