ESG Performance and Credit Risk in Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21446/scg_ufrj.v0i0.53433Palavras-chave:
credit risk, rating, ESG, Latin America, ESG performanceResumo
Previous studies suggest that the environmental, social and governance performance of companies helps to build a stronger image and reputation, thus providing better financial performance. However, the adoption of environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices as a tool for financial risk management is still little explored, especially in undeveloped economies. This research seeks to fill this gap by investigating whether the adoption of ESG practices reduces credit risk in publicly traded companies in Latin America. The results, obtained through an ordered logistic regression, considering the rating of the companies as a dependent variable and the indices of the ESG dimensions, obtained by the Refinitiv base, as explanatory variables, provide evidence that ESG practices are not being considered for the assignment of credit risk ratings from Moody’s and Fitch agencies. Thus, ESG practices are not helping to reduce credit risk, especially when we consider Argentine and Peruvian companies. The results are robust, even when considering the capital structure, profitability, leverage, size, and asset turnover. Thus, the article contributes by showing that even with the advances of credit rating agencies in adopt ESG indicators, it is still not possible to observe an impact on credit risk reduction, as evidenced by the literature.
Referências
Ackerman, R.W. (1973). How companies respond to social demands. Harvard Business Review, v.51, n.4, p.88-98.
Ackerman, R.W.; & Bauer, R. A. (1976). Corporate Social Respossiveness. Upper Side River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Alberton, A. (2003). Meio Ambiente e Desempenho Econômico-Financeiro: o Impacto da ISO 14001 nas Empresas Brasileiras. Tese de doutorado, apresentado para a obtenção do título no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 307 p.
Albuquerque, R. A.; Koskinen, Y.; & Zhang, C. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence. European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI).
Altman, E. I. (2005). An emerging market credit scoring system for corporate bonds. Emerging Markets Review, 6, 311-323.
Arminen, H; Puumalainem, K.; Patari, S.; & Fellnhofer, K. (2018). Corporate social performance: Inter-industry and international diferences. Journal of cleaner production, v.177 p.426-437.
Bansal, P. (2002). The corporate challenges of sustainable development. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 122-131.
Bansal, P. & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 93-103.
Benlemlih, M.; & Girerd-Potin, I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On themoderating role of the legal environment. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44, 1137–1166.
Buysse, K.; & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 453-470.
Chan, R. Y. K. (2005). Does the natural-resource-based view of the firm apply in an emerging economy? A survey of foreign invested enterprises in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 625-672.
Carroll, A. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academic of Management Review, v. 4, n. 4, p. 497-505.
Chen, L. J.; Feldmann, A.; Tang, O. (2015). The relationship between disclosures of corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidences from GRI reports in manufacturing industry. International journal of production economics, v.170, p.445-456.
Dixon-Fowler, H. R., Slater, D. J., Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E., & Romi, A. M. (2013). Beyond ‘‘does it pay to be green?’’ A metaanalysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 112 (2), 353–366.
Dobler, M., Lajili, K., & Ze´ghal, D. (2014). Environmental performance, environmental risk and risk management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23 (1), 1–17.
Desender, K. A.; & Epure, M. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social performance. Barcelona GSE Working Paper, n.730.
Diebecker, J., & Sommer, F. (2017). The impact of corporate sustainability performance on information asymmetry: the role of institutional differences. Rev Manag Sci, 11, 471–517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0195-y
Eccles, R. G.; Ioannou, I.; & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, v.60, n.11, p. 2835-2857.
Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., & Hoppe, H. (2014). Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal, 1, 288–303.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publising Inc.
Grewatsch, S.; & Kleindienst, I. (2017). When Does It Pay to be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability-Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Ethics, v.145, n.2, p. 383-416.
Hsu, F. J.; & Chen, Y. C. (2015). Is a firm’s financial risk associated with corporate social responsibility? Management Decision, 53 (9), 2175-2199.
Ioannou, I.; & Serafeim, G. (2012). What Drives Corporate Social Performance? The Role of Nation-level Institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 43, n. 9, p. 834-864.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 2, p. 404-437.
Klassen, R. D.; & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1464-1482.
Lima et al. (2018). Os Determinantes dos Ratings de Crédito dos Bancos Brasileiros. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22 (2), 178-200.
Lima, F. G. (2015). Análise de riscos. São Paulo: Atlas, 318 p.
Lin, W., et al. (2017). Impact of Positive and Negative Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance and Idiosyncratic Risk. Global Conference on Business and Economics Research (GCBER), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.
Margolis, J. D.; & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and Profits? The Search for a Link between a Company's Social and Financial Performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Muhammad, N.; Scrimgeour, F.; Reddy, K.; & Abidin, S. (2015). The Impact of Corporate Environmental Performance on Market Risk: The Australian Industry Case. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 347–362.
Nidumolu, R.; Prahalad, C. K.; & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87, 56-64.
Oliveira, N. dos S.; Gomes, S. M. da S.; Fernandes, G. B.; & Ribeiro, M. de S. (2015). The enigmatic impact of Corporate Social Responsibilities on the economic performance of Brazilian companies. Chinese Business Review, 14 (3), 143-158.
Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business and Society, 40, 369–396.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (3), 403-441.
Reis, H. L. (2002). Os impactos de um Sistema de Gestão Ambiental no desempenho financeiro das empresas: um estudo de caso. In: Encontro Nacional da Associação Nacional dos programas de Pós-Graduação em Administração (ENANPAD), 26, 2002, Salvador.
Salama, A.; Anderson, K.; & Toms, J. S. (2011). Does Community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994-2004. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20 (2), 192-204.
Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytic framework. California Management Review, v.17, n.3, p. 58-64.
Sison, A. (2009). From CSR to Corporate Citizenship: Anglo-American and Continental European Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 89, p. 235-246.
Slawinski, N.; & Bansal, P. (2015). Short on Time: intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26 (2), 531-549.
Utz, S. (2018). Over-investment or risk mitigation? Corporate social responsibility in Asia-Pacific, Europe, Japan, and the United States. Review of Financial Economics, 36 (2), 167-193.
Waddock, S. A.; & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, v. 8, n. 4, p. 303-319.
Wang, Y. J.; Berens, G. (2015). The Impact of Four Types of Corporate Social Performance on Reputation and Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, v.131, n.2, p.337-359.
Wartick, S. L.; Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, v.10, n.4, p. 758-769.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review, v. 16, n.4, p.691-718.
Wood, D. J.; & Logsdon, J. M. (2001). Theorising business citizenship. Perspectives on Coporate Citizenship, v.21, p. 83-103.
Downloads
Arquivos adicionais
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
DIREITOS DE AUTOR: O autor retém, sem restrições dos direitos sobre sua obra.
DIREITOS DE REUTILIZAÇÃO: O Periódico SCG adota a Licença Creative Commons, CC BY-NC atribuição não comercial conforme a Política de Acesso Aberto ao conhecimento adotado pelo Portal de Periódicos da UFRJ. Com essa licença é permitido acessar, baixar (download), copiar, imprimir, compartilhar, reutilizar e distribuir os artigos, desde que para uso não comercial e com a citação da fonte, conferindo os devidos créditos de autoria e menção à SCG. Nesses casos, nenhuma permissão é necessária por parte dos autores ou dos editores.
DIREITOS DE DEPÓSITO DOS AUTORES/AUTOARQUIVAMENTO: Os autores são estimulados a realizarem o depósito em repositórios institucionais da versão publicada com o link do seu artigo na SCG.
