Sexismo ambivalente relacionado à violência por parceiros íntimos: uma revisão

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36482/1809-5267.ARBP-2022v74.19545

Palabras clave:

Sexismo, Violência por parceiros íntimos, Violência de gênero

Resumen

A Teoria do Sexismo Ambivalente (SA) propõe uma ambivalência nas manifestações sexistas em relação às mulheres, envolvendo tanto crenças e atitudes abertamente discriminatórias, quanto uma visão de cunho protecionista, idealizador e afetivo. Alguns autores, sobretudo de áreas sociais e de saúde, associam os postulados desta teoria ao fenômeno da violência por parceiros íntimos (VPI). Sendo assim, esta pesquisa consiste em uma revisão sistemática da literatura com objetivo de identificar as relações estabelecidas, em artigos científicos, entre o SA e a VPI. A busca foi realizada nas bases de dados da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), PsycInfo, PubMed, SciELO e Web of Science. Foram selecionados 29 artigos para compor o trabalho. Os resultados apontaram as mulheres como principais vítimas da VPI e mostraram que o sexismo ambivalente pode ter influências significativas neste contexto, podendo atuar como uma maneira de legitimar e sustentar as desigualdades de gênero.

Citas

Allen, C. T., Swan, S. C., & Raghavan, C. (2009). Gender symmetry, sexism, and intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(11), 1816–1834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508325496

Altemeyer, R. A., & Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University.

Alvarez, C., Lameiras-Fernandez, M., Holliday, C. N., Sabri, B., & Campbell, J. (2018). Latina and caribbean immigrant women’s experiences with intimate partner violence: A story of ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7-8):3831-3854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518777006

Archer, J. (2000). Sex difference in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5):651-680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651

Arnoso, A., Ibabe, I., Arnoso, M., Elgorriaga, E. (2017) El sexismo como predictor de la violencia de pareja en un contexto multicultural. Anuario de Psicologia Juridica, 27(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apj.2017.02.001

Berke, D. S., & Zeichner, A. (2016). Testing a dual process model of gender-based violence: A laboratory examination. Violence and Victims, 31(2), 200-214. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-14-00060

Boira, S., Chilet-Rosell, E., Jaramillo-Quiroz, S., & Reinoso, J. (2017). Sexismo, pensamientos distorsionados y violencia en las relaciones de pareja en estudiantes universitarios de Ecuador de áreas relacionadas con el bienestar y la salud. Universitas Psychologica, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-4.spdv

Brasil. (2006). Lei n. 11.340, de 7 de agosto de 2006. Cria mecanismos para coibir a violência doméstica e familiar contra a mulher, nos termos do § 8o do art. 226 da Constituição Federal, da Convenção sobre a Eliminação de Todas as Formas de Discriminação contra as Mulheres e da Convenção Interamericana para Prevenir, Punir e Erradicar a Violência contra a Mulher; dispõe sobre a criação dos Juizados de Violência Doméstica e Familiar contra a Mulher; altera o Código de Processo Penal, o Código Penal e a Lei de Execução Penal; e dá outras providências.

Corradi, C. (2009) Violence, identité et pouvoir: Pour une sociologie de la violence dans le contexte de la modernité. Socio-logos, (4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4000/socio-logos.2296

Easteal, P., Holland, K., & Judd, K. (2015). Enduring themes and silences in media portrayals of violence against women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 48, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.015

Expósito, F., Herrera, M. C., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (2010). Don’t rock the boat: Women’s benevolent sexism predicts fears of marital violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01539.x

Ferreira, M. C. (2004). Sexismo hostil e benevolente: Inter-relações e diferenças de gênero. Temas em Psicologia, 12(2), 119-126.

Frieze, I. H. (2005). Female violence against intimate partners: An introduction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(3), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00217.x

Gaertner, S.L., & Dovidio, J.F. (1986). The aversiveform ofracism. In J. F. Dovidio, & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61–89). New York: Academic Press.

Gage, A. N., & Lease, S. H. (2018). An exploration of the link between masculinity and endorsement of IPV myths in american men. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(13-14), 6145-6165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518818430

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of women quarterly, 23(3), 519-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology Of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 530-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414832

Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B. et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763-775. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.763

Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & Souza, M. A. D. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068

Gölge, Z. B., Sanal, Y., Yavuz, S., & Arslanoglu-Çetin, E. (2016). Attitudes toward wife abuse of police officers and judiciary members in Turkey: Profession, gender, ambivalent sexism and sex roles. Journal of Family Violence, 31(6), 785-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9823-1

Gracia, E., Garcia, F., & Lila, M. (2014). Male police officers’ law enforcement preferences in cases of intimate partner violence versus non-intimate interpersonal violence: Do sexist attitudes and empathy matter? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(10), 1195-1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814541655

Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Mikulincer, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Guerrero-Molina, M., Moreno-Manso, J. M., Guerrero-Barona, E., & Cruz-Márquez, B. (2017a). Attributing responsibility, sexist attitudes, perceived social support, and self-esteem in aggressors convicted for gender-based violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(21-22), 4468-4491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715025

Guerrero-Molina, M., Moreno-Manso, J. M., Guerrero-Barona, E., & Cruz-Márquez, B. (2017b). Actitudes sexistas y asunción de responsabilidad en agresores condenados a prisión por violencia de género en España durante los años 2012 y 2013. Universitas Psychologica, 16(3), 152-164. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy16-3.asar

Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11211-007-0034-z

Hamby, S. L. (1996). The dominance scale: Preliminary psychometric properties. Violence and Victims, 11(3), 199-212.

Herrera, A., Valor-Segura, I., & Expósito, F. (2012). Is miss sympathy a credible defendant alleging intimate partner violence in a trial for murder? European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 4(2), 179-196.

Jiménez, A. A., Priego, M. B., Gutiérrez, M. F., Molina, E. L., Villacreces Flores, N. M., & García Ramírez, J. M. (2015). Violencia de la mujer hacia el hombre,¿ mito o realidad? REiDoCrea: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Docencia Creativa, 4, 14-17.

Knox, D. J. (1970). Conceptions of love at three developmental levels. The Family Coordinator, 19(2), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/582445

Kosterina, E., Horne, S. G., & Lamb, S. (2019). The role of gender-based violence, health worries, and ambivalent sexism in the development of women’s gynecological symptoms. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(4), 567-579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318825292

Krug, E. G. (2002). Relatório mundial sobre violência e saúde. Genebra: World Health

Organization.

Lee, M. S., Begun, S., De Prince, A. P., & Chu, A. T. (2016). Acceptability of dating violence and expectations of relationship harm among adolescent girls exposed to intimate partner violence. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 8(4), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000130

Lelaurain, S., Fonte, D., Aim, M. A., Khatmi, N., Decarsin, T., Lo Monaco, G. et al. (2017). “One doesn’t slap a girl but…” Social representations and conditional logics in legitimization of intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 78(9-10), 637-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0821-4

Lelaurain, S., Fonte, D., Giger, J. C., Guignard, S., & Lo Monaco, G. (2018). Legitimizing intimate partner violence: the role of romantic love and the mediating effect of patriarchal ideologies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13-14), 6351-6368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518818427

Levant, R. F. (1992). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(3-4), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.379

Li, D., & Zheng, L. (2017). Intimate partner violence and controlling behavior among male same-sex relationships in China: Relationship with ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1-2), 208-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517724835

Loveland, J. E., & Raghavan, C. (2017). Coercive control, physical violence, and masculinity. Violence and Gender, 4(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2016.0019

Marques-Fagundes, A. L., Megías, J. L., García-García, D. M., & Petkanopoulou, K. (2015). Ambivalent sexism and egalitarian ideology in perception of psychological abuse and (in) vulnerability to violence/Sexismo ambivalente e ideología igualitaria en la percepción del maltrato psicológico y la (in) vulnerabilidad a la violencia. Revista de Psicología Social, 30(1), 31-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2014.991519

McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism. In J. F. Dovidio, &S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). New York: Academic.

Novo, M., Herbón, J., & Amado, B. G. (2016). Género y victimización: Efectos en la evaluación de la violencia psicológica sutil y manifiesta, apego adulto y tácticas de resolución de conflictos. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 7(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rips.2016.05.002

Pérez, V. A. F., Fiol, E. B., Palmer, M. C. R., & Guzmán, C. N. (2006). Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja: Determinantes sociodemográficos, familiares y formativos. Anales de Psicología, 22(2), 251-259.

Peters, J. (2008). Measuring myths about domestic violence: Development and initial validation of the domestic violence myth acceptance scale. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770801917780.

Peterson, B., Smith, J. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Shaw, M. P. (2009). On the “exporting” of morality: Its relation to political conservatism and epistemic motivation. Social Justice Research, 22(2-3), 206-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0101-8

Renzetti, C. M., Lynch, K. R., & DeWall, C. N. (2018). Ambivalent sexism, alcohol use, and intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of interpersonal violence, 33(2), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515604412

Riley, C. E., & Yamawaki, N. (2018). Who is helpful? Examining the relationship between ambivalent sexism, right-wing authoritarianism, and intentions to help domestic violence victims. Sage open, 8(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018781899

Saltzman, L. E., Fanslow, J. E., McMahon, P. M., & Shelley, G. A. (1999). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements, version 1.0. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Sibley, C. G., & Perry, R. (2010). An opposing process model of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9705-6

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance theory: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Soto-Quevedo, O. A. (2012). Rol del sexismo ambivalente y de la transgresión de estereotipo de género en la atribución de culpa a mujeres víctimas de violencia de pareja. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 15(2), 135-147.

Stevens, C., Oliveira, S., Zanello, V., Silva, E., & Portela, C. (2017). Mulheres e violências: Interseccionalidades. Brasília: Technopolitik.

Straus, M. A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(3), 252-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.004

Valor-Segura, I., Expósito, F., & Moya, M. (2011). Victim blaming and exoneration of the perpetrator in domestic violence: The role of beliefs in a just world and ambivalent sexism. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.17

Vecina, M. L. (2017). Moral variables before and after a court‐mandated psychological treatment of men convicted of violence against their partners: Evolution and relationship with sexist attitudes. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14(3), 332-341. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1480

Vecina, M. L. (2018). How can men convicted of violence against women feel moral while holding sexist and violent attitudes? A homeostatic moral model based on self-deception. American Journal of Men’s Health, 12(5), 1554-1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318774218

Vecina, M. L., & Piñuela, R. (2017). Relationships between ambivalent sexism and the five moral foundations in domestic violence: Is it a matter of fairness and authority? The Journal of Psychology, 151(3), 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1289145

Vidal-Fernández, A., & Megías, J. (2014). Attributions of blame to battered women when they are perceived as feminists or as “difficult to deal with”. The Journal of Psychology, 17. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.26

World Health Organization (2017). Violence against women. Geneva: WHO. Recuperado de: http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women

World Health Organization. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva: WHO. Recuperado de: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/24159358X/en/

World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: WHO. Recuperado de: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9789241564625/en/

Yamawaki, N., Ostenson, J., & Brown, C. R. (2009). The functions of gender role traditionality, ambivalent sexism, injury, and frequency of assault on domestic violence perception: a study between japanese and american college students. Violence Against Women, 15(9), 1126-1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209340758

Zapata-Calvente, A. L., & Megías, J. L. (2017). Social perception of intimate partner violence according to the motivations and sex of the aggressor and the ideology and sex of the observers. Revista de Psicología Social, 32(2), 301–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2017.1297355.

Descargas

Número

Vol. 74 (2022)

Sección

Artículos

Licencia

La aprobación de los textos implica a cesión inmediata y sin encargos de los derechos de publicación en la Revista Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, que tendrá la exclusividad de publicarlos por primera. El autor continuará, no obstante, a detener los derechos autorales para publicaciones posteriores. En el caso de nueva publicación de los artículos en otros vehículos, se recomienda la mención a la primera publicación en Arquivos Brasileros de Psicologia.

Derechos Autorales para artículos publicados en esta revista son del autor, con derechos a primera publicación en la revista. En virtud de parecer en esta revista de acceso público, los artículos son de acceso gratuito, en aplicaciones educacionales y no comerciales.

Reprodución parcial de otras publicaciones

Manuscritos sometidos que contengan partes de texto extraídas de otras publicaciones deberán obedecer a los límites especificados para garantizar originalidad del trabajo sometido. Se recomienda evitar la reproducción de figuras, tablas y dibujos extraídos de otras publicaciones.

El manuscrito que contener reproducción de una o más figuras, tablas y dibujos extraídos de otras publicaciones sólo será encaminada para análisis si acompañado de permiso escrita del detentor del derecho autoral del trabajo original para la reproducción especificada en Arquivos Brasileros de Psicologia. El permiso debe ser direccionado al autor del trabajo sometido. En ninguna circunstancia Arquivos Brasileros de Psicologia y los autores de los trabajos publicados en esta Revista harán un repaso de los derechos obtenidos.