Gynaikologia: O Econômico de Xenofonte e Leo Strauss
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17074/cpc.v1i42.49623Schlagworte:
Xenofonte, Econômico, Leo Strauss, gênero, filosofia grega da economiaAbstract
Leo Strauss se utilizou de Xenofonte em toda a sua produção filosófica. Em sua constante análise do discurso socrático, Strauss não resistiu em fazer uma interpretação do Econômico de Xenofonte. Neste artigo, analisaremos a relação de Strauss com Xenofonte e, sucintamente, o seu exercício hermenêutico dos capítulos de seus comentários sobre o Econômico intitulados gynaikologia, e o compararemos com duas abordagens da filosofia, primeiro, de mãos dadas com o uso dos prazeres de Michel Foucault e, em seguida, um trabalho recente sobre a filosofia grega da economia de Étienne Helmer.Literaturhinweise
ALTINI, C. Leo Strauss. Linguaggio del potere e linguaggio della filosofía. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2000.
AULT, B. A. Oikos and oikonomia. Greek houses, households and the domestic economy. WESTGAT, R.; FISHER, N.; WHITLEY, J. (Ed.). Building Communities: House, Settlement and Society in the Aegean and Beyond. Exter: Short Run Press Ltd., 2007, p. 259-265.
AZOULAY, V. Xénophon et les grâces du pouvoir. De la charis au charisme. Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne 2004.
BÉNATOUÏL, T. Les possessions du sage et le dépouillement du philosophe, Rursus 3, p. 1-17, 2008.
BEUTLER, C. Un chapitre de la sensibilité collective : la littérature agricole en Europe continentale au XVIe siècle, Annales, Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 5, 1973, p. 1280-1301.
BOEHRINGER, S.; LORENZINI, D. (dirs.). Foucault, la sexualité, l’Antiquité. París: Éditions Kimé, 2016.
BROWN FERRARIO, S. Xenophon and Greek Political Thought. In: FLOWER, M. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, p. 57-83.
BRUELL, C. Xenophons Politische Philosophie. München: Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung,1990.
_____. Xenophon. In: STRAUSS, L.; CROPSEY, J. (ed.). History of Political Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987 [1963], p. 90–117.
BRÛLÉ, P.; OULHEN, J.; PROST F. (éds.). Économie et Société en Grèce antique. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2007.
BURNS, T. W. (ed.). Brill’s Companion to Leo Strauss’ Writings on Classical Political Thought. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2015.
BUZZETTI, E. A Guide to the Study of Leo Strauss’ On Tyranny. In: BURNS, T. W. (ed.). Brill’s Companion to Leo Strauss’ Writings on Classical Political Thought. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2015, p. 227-257.
CARLIER, P. L’idée de monarchie impériale dans La Cyropédie, Ktéma 3, 1978, p. 133-163.
COX, C. A. Household Interests. Property, Marriage Strategies, and Family Dynamics in Ancient Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.
DELEBECQUE, É. Sur la date et l’objet de l’Économique, Revue des Études Grecques 64, 1951, p. 21-58.
DELEBECQUE, É. Essai sur la vie de Xénophon. Paris: C. Klincksieck, 1957.
DORION, L.-A. Socrate oikonomikos. In: NARCY, M.; TORDESILLAS, A. (éds.). Xénophon et Socrate. París: Vrin, 2008, p. 253-281.
DUE, B. The Cyropaedia. Xenophon’s Aims and Methods. Aarhus Copenhague: Aarhus University Press, 1989.
FIGUEIRA, T.Economic In the Works of Xenophon. In: HOBDEN, F.; TUPLIN, C. (éds.). Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2012, p. 665-688.
FLOWER, M. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
FORNIS, C. El mito de Esparta: Un itinerario por la cultura occidental. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2019.
FOUCAULT, M. Historia de la sexualidad II. El uso de los placeres. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España Editores, S.A., 2019 (París, 1984).
FOXHALL, L. Household, Gender and Property in Classical Athens, The Classical Quaterly 39(1), 1989, p. 22-44.
GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ, M. ¿Príncipes o tiranos? La Ciropedia de Jenofonte, la monarquía aqueménida y los specula principum de la modernidad (siglo XVI), Gerión 37(2), p. 288-423, 2019.
_____. Cyrus the Gentleman (καλοκἀγαθός)?: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and Leo Strauss – no prelo.
GERA, D. L. Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Style, Genre and Literary Technique. Oxford: OUP, 1993.
GISH, D.; AMBLER, W. S. The Political Thought of Xenophon, Polis 26/2, 2009.
GRAY, V. J. Xenophon’s Mirror of Princes. Reading the Reflections. New York: OUP, 2011.
GUGLIELMINA, P. Leo Strauss et l’art de lire. Postface à Leo Strauss. In: STRAUSS, L. La renaissance du rationalisme politique classique. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1993.
HELMER, É. (dir.). Richesse et pauvreté chez les philosophes de l’Antiquité. París: Vrin, 2016.
_____. Oikonomia. Philosophie grecque de l’économie. París: Classiques Garnier, 2021.
HÉMARDINQUER, M. La Cyrópedie. Essai sur les idées morales et politiques de Xénophon. Paris: Wentworth, 1872.
HERFST, P. Le travail de la femme dans la Grèce ancienne. Utrecht : A. Oosterhoek, 1922.
HIGGINS, E. Xenophon the Athenian. The Problem of the Individual and the Society of the Polis. Albany (NY): State University of New York Press, 1977.
HOUMANIDIS, L. Xenophon’s economic idees, Archives of Economic History 2, 1993, p. 79-102.
HUTCHINSON, G. Xenophon and the Art of Command. London: Greenhill Books/Lionel Leventhal, 2000.
JOHNSON, D. M. Strauss on Xenophon. In: HOBDEN, F.; TUPLIN, C. (éds.). Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2012, p. 123-159.
LUCCIONI, J. Les idées politiques et sociales de Xénophon. Paris: Ophrys, 1947.
MEYER, K. Xenophons “Oikonomikos”. Übersetzung und Kommentar. Marburgo: Buchdruckerei und Verlag P. Kaesberger, 1975.
MOMIGLIANO, A. Essays on Ancient and Modern Judaism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994, p. 178-189 (1967).
MOSSÉ, C. Xénophon économiste. In: BINGEN, J.; CAMBIER, G.; NACHTERGAEL, G. (éds.). Le Monde grec. Pensée, Littérature, Histoire, Documents. Hommages à C. Préaux. Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1975, p. 169-176.
_____. La mujer en la Grecia clásica. Hondarribia: Editorial Nerea, 1990. (París, 1983).
_____. El hombre y la economia. In: VERNANT, J.-P. (ed.). El hombre griego. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1993.
MUELLER-GOLDINGEN, C. Untersuchungen zu Xenophons Kyrupädie. Stuttgart-Leipzig: De Gruyter, 1995.
MÜNSCHER, K. Xenophon in der griechisch-römischen Literatur. Leipzig: Dieterich'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1920.
NADON, C. Xenophon’s Prince. Republic and Empire in the Cyropaedia. BerkeleyLos Angeles: University of California Press, 2001.
_____. Editor’s Introduction: Strauss Course Transcript on Xenophon: 1963. In: STRAUSS, L. Lectures on Xenophon. A course offered in winter quarter, 1963. Edited and with an introduction by C. Nadon. Department of Political Science, The University of Chicago, 2016, p. i-xiii.
NEWELL, W. R. Tyranny and the Science of Ruling in Xenophon’s Education of Cyrus, Journal of Politics 45, 1983, p. 889-905.
_____. Tyranny. A New Interpretation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
OLLIER, F. Le mirage spartiate. París: De Boccard, 1933.
PANGLE, T. Leo Strauss. An introduction to his thought and intellectual legacy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.
PÉBARTHE, Oikonomia, entre champ économique, champ politique et champ philosophique en Grèce ancienne. Méditations bourdieusiennes sur l’Économique de Xénophon, Revue Française de Socio-Économie 13 (1), 2014, p. 67-84.
PLÁCIDO SUÁREZ, D. La Dépendance dans l’Économique de Xénophon. París: Presses universitaires franc-comtoises, 2001.
_____. La historicité du personatge de Socrate dans l’Économique de Xénophon. In: NARCY, M.; TORDESILLAS, A. (éds.). Xénophon et Socrate. París: Vrin, 2008, p. 235-251.
POMEROY, S. B. Xenophon, Oeconomicus. A Social and Historical Commentary with a new translation by Sarah B. Pomeroy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
_____. Families in Classical and Hellenistic Greece: Representations
and Realities. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
RAWSON, E. The Spartan tradition in European thought. Oxford: Clarendon, 1969.
ROOD, T. Political Thought in Xenophon: Straussian Readings of the Anabasis, Polis, The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 32, 2015, p. 143-165
RUDERMAN, R. S. (2015): “On Leo Strauss’ Presentation of Xenophon’s Political Philosophy in “The Problem of Socrates””. BURNS, T. W. (ed.). Brill’s Companion to Leo Strauss’ Writings on Classical Political Thought. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2015, p. 193-212.
SALES I CODERCH, J; MONTSERRAT I MOLAS, J. Introducció a la lectura de Leo Strauss. Barcelona: Barcelonesa d'Edicions, 1991.
SALLER, R. P. Household and Gender. In: SCHEIDEL, W.; MORRIS, I.; SALLER, R. (eds.). The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World. Camdridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, p. 87-112.
SCHEIDEL, W.; MORRIS, I.; SALLER, R. (eds.). The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World. Camdridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
SÉBILLOTTE, V. Women and the Economic History of the Ancient Greek World: Still a challenge for gender studies. In: LION, B.; MICHEL, C. (éd.). The Role of Women in Work and Society in the Ancient Near East. Boston; Berlín: De Gruyter, 2016, p. 543-563.
SOLANA DUESO, J. (2014): Aspasia de Mileto y la emancipación de las mujeres. Wilamowitz frente a Bruns. Zaragoza: Jose Solana Dueso, 2014.
STRAUSS, L. The Spirit of Sparta or the Taste of Xenophon, Social Research 6:1/4, 1939, p. 502–36.
_____. Book Review of L. Olschki, Machiavelli the Scientist, Social Research, XIII, 1946, p. 121-124.
_____. Walker’s Machiavelli Reviewed Work: The Discourses of Niccolò Machiavelli by Leslie J. Walke, The Review of Metaphysics vol. 6, No. 3, Mar. 1953, p. 437-446.
_____. Thoughts on Machiavelli. Glencoe; Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
STRAUSS, L. Lectures on Xenophon. A course offered in winter quarter, 1963. Edited and with an introduction by C. Nadon. Department of Political Science, The University of Chicago, 2016.
_____. The City and Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
_____. Greek Historians, Review of Metaphysics 21/4, 1968, p. 656-666.
_____. Xenophon’s Socratic Discourse: An Interpretation of the Oeconomicus. Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1970.
_____. The Argument and the Action of Plato’s Laws. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
_____. Xenophon’s Anabasis (1975). In: Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983, p. 105-136.
_____. The Problem of Socrates: Five Lectures. In: PANGLE, T. L. (ed.). The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism. An Introduction to the Thought of Leo Strauss. Essays and Lectures by Leo Strauss. Chicago; London: 1989, p. 103-183.
_____. On Tyranny. Revised and expanded edition including the Strauss-Kojève Correspondence edited by Victor Gourevitch and Michael S. Roth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
TATUM, J. Xenophon’s Imperial Fiction. On The Education of Cyrus. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.
TODD LOWRY, S. The Greek Heritage in Economic Thought. In: TODD LOWRY, S. (ed.), Pre-Classical Economic Thought From the Greek to the Scottish Enlightment. Boston, 1987, p. 7-30.
TODD LOWRY, S. Xenophons ökonomisches Denken über “Oikonomikos” hinaus. In: TODD LOWRY, S.; SCHEFOLD, B.; SCHEFOLD, K.; SCHMITT, A. (eds.). Xenophons Oikonomikos. Vademecum zu einem Klassiker der Haushaltsökonomie. Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, p. 77-93.
TUPLIN, C. Xenophon, Sparta, and the Cyropaedia. In: POWELL, A.; HODKINSON, S. (eds.). The Shadow of Sparta. London: Routledge, 1994, p. 127-181.
_____. (ed.). Xenophon and his World. Papers from Conference Held in Liverpool in July 1999. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2004.
VOEGELIN, E. Review of Leo Strauss, On Tyranny, The Review of Politics, 1949, p. 241-244.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
