"We the people", "They the people" e o Enigma do Constitucionalismo Democrático
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21875/tjc.v2i1.12744Keywords:
Tradução, Translation, Português, Portuguese, Constitucionalismo democrático, Democratic Constitutionalism, David StraussAbstract
RESUMO:
Tradução do artigo "We the people, They the people, and the puzzle of democratic constitutionalism"
ABSTRACT:
Portuguese version of "We the people, They the people, and the puzzle of democratic constitutionalism"
References
ACKERMAN, Bruce. We The People: Foundations. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1991.
ACKERMAN, Bruce. We The People: Transformations. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1998.
ACKERMAN, Bruce. The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution, Yale Law Journal, vol. 93, p. 1013-1072, 1984.
BALKIN, Jack M. Living Originalism. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2011.
BARRON, David J.; LEDERMAN, Martin S. The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb—A Constitutional History, Harvard Law Review, v. 121, p. 941, 2008.
BICKEL, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962.
BREST, Paul. The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding. Boston University Law Review, v. 60, p. 204-205, 1980.
CARDOZO, Benjamin N. Adherence to Precedent. The Subconscious Element in the Judicial Process, The nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1921.
ELSTER, Jon. The Optimal Design of a Constituent Assembly. In: LANDEMORE ,Hélène; ELSTER, Jon (eds.). Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
ESKRIDGE, William N. Jr; FEREJOHN, John. Constitutional Horticulture: Deliberation-Respecting Judicial Review, Texas Law Review, v. 87, p. 1273 e 1281. 2009.
FALLÓN Jr., Richard H. A Constructivist Coherence Theory of Constitutional Interpretation. Harvard Law Review, v. 100, p. 1189 e 1195, 1987.
FLEMING, James E. Toward a More Democratic Congress? Boston University Law Review, v. 89, p. 629 e 640. 2009.
FRIEDMAN, Barry. The Will Of The People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced The Supreme Court And Shaped The Meaning Of The Constitution. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 2009.
GILLMAN, Howard. Party Politics and Constitutional Change: The Political Origins of Liberal Judicial Activism. In: KAHN, Ronald; KERSH, Ken I. (Eds). The Supreme Court And American Political Development. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006.
HAMILTON, MADISON, JAY. O Federalista. Portugal: Ed. Calouste Gulbekian, 2011.
KLARMAN, Michael J. Constitutional Fact/Constitutional Fiction: A Critique of Bruce Ackerman's Theory of Constitutional Moments, Stanford Law Review, v. 44, p. 759 e 765, 1992.
KRAMER, Larry. What's a Constitution For Anyway? Of History and Theory, Bruce Ackerman and The New Deal, Case Western Reserve Law Review, v. 46, p. 885 e 921, 1996.
LAIN, Corinna Barret. Upside-Down Judicial Review, The Georgetown Law Journal, v. 101, p. 113, 2012.
LEVINSON, Sanford. Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where The Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We The People Can Correct It). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
OGLETREE JR., Charles J. From Dred Scott to Barack Obama: The Ebb and Flow of Race Jurisprudence, Harvard Blackletter Law Journal, v. 25, 2009.
PILDES, Richard H. Is the Supreme Court a "Majoritarian" Institution? The Supreme Court Review, v. 2010, p. 103 e 105. 2011.
RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
REHFELD, Andrew. Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy, AM. POL. SCl. REV, v. 103, p. 214. 2009.
ROSEN, Jeffrey. The Most Democratic Branch: How The Courts Serve America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
SHOWRONEK, Stephen. Building A New American State: The Expansion Of National Administrative Capacities 1877-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
SIEGEL, Reva B. She The People: The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism, and the Family, Harvard Law Review, v. 115, 2002.
SIMON, Larry G. The Authority of the Framers of the Constitution: Can Originalist Interpretation Be Justified? California Law Review, v. 73, p. 1482; 1498; 1499-1500. 1985.
STRAUSS, David A. Common law Constitutional Interpretation. U. Chicago Law Review, v. 63, p. 877, 1996.
STRAUSS, David A. Freedom of Speech and the Common-Law Constitution. In: STONE, Geoffrey R.; BOLLINGER, Lee C (Eds). Eternally Vigilant: Free Speech In The Modern Era. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2002.
STRAUSS, David A. The living constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
SUAREZ, Ray. Interview by Ray Suarez with Elzena Johnson, Delegate to the 2012 Democratic Nat'l Convention, in Charlotte, N.C. (Sept. 6, 2012). Disponível em < https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbk5NsA3Cyw>. Acesso em: 06 set. 2017.
US CONSTITUTION, 1787.
US OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL. Lawfubess of Recess Appointments During a Recess of the Senate Notwithstanding Periodic Pro Forma Sessions. Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel, Vol. 36, p. 5-9, 2012. Disponível em: <http://justice.gov/olc/20l2/pro-fonna-sessions-opinion.pdf>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
US SUPREME COURT. Snyder v. Phelps, 131 S. Ct. 1207, 1215-19 (2011). Disponível em: <https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/562/443/>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
US SUPREME COURT. Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876, 913 (2010). Disponível em: <https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf.>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
US SUPREME COURT. United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 602, 605 (2000). Disponível em: <https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/529/598/case.html>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
US SUPREME COURT. Noel Canning v. NLRB, 705 F.3d 490, 499-507 (D.C. Cir. 2013). Disponível em: <https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-1281>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
US SUPREME COURT. Evans v. Stephens, 387 F.3d 1220, 1224-26 (11th Cir. 2004). Disponível em: <https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-828.ZA.html>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
US SUPREME COURT. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). Disponível em: <https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/483/>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
US SUPREME COURT. United States v. Carolene Products Co. 304 U.S. 144 (1938). Disponível em: <https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/304/144/case.html>. Acesso em: 02 set. 2017.
WHITTINGTON, Keith E. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
1. The authors maintain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or as a personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Brazil License.
