Eros e Thanatos

Authors

  • Susana de Castro UFRJ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47661/afcl.v8i16.3136

Keywords:

love, death, soul's immortality, Orphism

Abstract

The main aim of this article is to prove that there is not an absolute unity between Plato's dialogues. He was a metaphysician in some themes and a non-metaphysician in others. Therefore, in his dialogue Phedon he gives a metaphysical explanation about death and the soul's immortality, but in another dialogue Phedro he assumes that carnal passion is an ultimate form of love.

Author Biography

Susana de Castro, UFRJ

Professora do Departamento de Filosofia da UFRJ

References

BERNABÉ, Alberto. Platão e o orfismo: diálogos entre religião e filosofia. Trad. Denys Garcia Xavier. São Paulo: Annablume, 2011.

PLATÃO. Fedro. Trad. Carlos Alberto Nunes. Belém: ed.UFPA, 2011

. Fédon. Trad. Carlos Alberto Nunes. Belém: ed.UFPA, 2011

RORTY, Richard. “A world without substances or essences”. Philosophy and Social Hope. Londres: Penguin, 1999.

. “Ethics without principles”. Philosophy and Social Hope. Londres: Penguin, 1999.

Published

2014-12-05