Ontology and Doxa. On Parmenides’ Dual Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47661/afcl.v14i28.38766Palabras clave:
Parmenides, Monism, Dualism, Ontology, Truth, DoxaResumen
Starting from Reinhardt’s interpretive instruction to take into account both parts of the poem of Parmenides in order to achieve a sufficient understanding of his philosophy, this paper aims to re-evaluate the state of recent scholarship, and to propose an approach that reveals the “dualistic methodology” at the heart of Parmenides’ philosophy. The ontological monism of Truth emerges as grounded in the dualistic projection of the concepts of Being and Nothing. The dualism of Doxa, structured upon the forms of Light and Night, evolves by producing a further duality: the erroneous opinions that separate the two forms have to be replaced by the appropriate cosmological world-order of their mixture. Finally, the poem as a whole, in its two parts, reflects a deeper duality, which signifies the profound distance that separates the human from the divine. The importance of all these binary structures compels us to re-examine the consideration of Parmenides as champion of a blind monism.Citas
Barnes, J., “Parmenides and the Eleatic One,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philo¬so¬phie 61 (1979) 1-21.
Bredlow, L.A., “Parmenides and the Grammar of Being,” Classical Philology 106 (2011) 283-298.
Burnet, J., Early Greek Philosophy (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1930, 4th ed.).
Cherubin, R., “Light, Night, and the Opinions of Mortals: Parmenides B8.51-61 and B9,” Ancient Philosophy 25 (2005) 1-23.
Cherubin, R., “Mortals Lay Down Trusting to be True,” Epoché 21 (2017) 251-271.
Clark, R.J., “Parmenides and Sense-perception,” Revue des Études Grecques 82 (1969) 14-32.
Cordero, N.-L., Les deux chemins de Parménide (édition critique, traduction, études et bibliographie) (Paris: J. Vrin & Bruxelles: Editions Ousia, 1997, 2nd ed.).
Cordero, N.-L., By being, it is: The thesis of Parmenides (Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2004).
Cordero, N.-L. et al., Eleatica 2006: Parmenide scienziato? (a cura di Livio Rossetti e Flavia Marcacci) (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2008).
Cordero, N.-L., “The ‘Doxa of Parmenides’ Dismantled,” Ancient Philosophy 30 (2010) 231-246.
Cordero, N.-L., “Parmenidean ‘Physics’ is not Part of what Parmenides calls ‘δόξα’,” in N.-L. Cordero (ed.), “Parmenides, Venerable and Αwesome” (Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2011) 95-113.
Cordero, N.-L., “Il y a, évidemment, un ‘Parménide phusikós,’ mais… (A propos de Livio Rossetti, Un altro Parmenide, 2017),” Archai 25 (2019) e02507.
Cosgrove, M.R., “What Are ‘True’ Doxai Worth to Parmenides? Essaying a fresh look at his Cosmology,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 46 (2014) 1-32.
Curd, P., The Legacy of Parmenides. Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).
Falus, R.: “Parmenides-Interpretationen,” Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 8 (1960) 267-294.
Fratticci, W.: “Apeonta, pareonta. On fragment B4 DK”. Anais de Filosofia Clássica 27 (2020) 246-270.
Graham, D.W., “Empedocles and Anaxagoras: Responses to Parmenides,” in A.A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 159-180.
Graham, D.W., Explaining the Cosmos. The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).
Graham, D.W., Science Before Socrates: Parmenides, Anaxagoras, and the New Astronomy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
Granger, H., “The Cosmology of Mortals,” in V. Caston & D.W. Graham (eds.), Presocratic Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos (Aldershot & Burlington: Ashgate, 2002) 101-116.
Gregory, A., “Parmenides, Cosmology and Sufficient Reason,” Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 47 (2014) 16-47.
Hölscher, U., Parmenides. Vom Wesen des Seienden (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1986, 2nd ed.).
Johansen, T.K., “Parmenides' Likely Story,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50 (2016) 1-29.
Kahn, C.H. (2002): “Parmenides and Plato Once More (For Alex Moureatos),” in Essays on Being (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) 192-217.
Kurfess, Ch., “The Truth about Parmenides’ Doxa,” Ancient Philosophy 36 (2016) 13-45.
Lesher, J.H., “Early Interest in Knowledge,” in A.A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) 225-249.
Mansfeld, J., “Parmenides from Right to Left,” in Studies in Early Greek Philosophy (Leiden: Brill, 2018).
McKirahan, R., “Signs and Arguments in Parmenides B8,” in P. Curd & D. Graham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Greek Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 189-229.
McKirahan, R., “An Aristotelianizing Parmenides,” Philosophia [Academy of Athens] 49, II (2020) 60-74.
Miller, M.H., “Parmenides and the Disclosure of Being,” Apeiron 13 (1979) 12-35.
Miller, M., “Ambiguity and Transport: Reflections on the proem to Parmenides' poem,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30 (2006) 1-47.
Mourelatos, A.P.D., “Determinacy and Indeterminacy, Being and Non-Being in the Frag-ments of Parmenides,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy (Suppl. Vol. 2, 1976) 45-60.
Mourelatos, A.P.D., “Some Alternatives in Interpreting Parmenides,” The Monist 62 (1979) 3-14.
Mourelatos, A.P.D., “Parmenides, Early Greek Astronomy, and Modern Scientific Realism,” in J. McCoy (ed.), Early Greek Philosophy (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2013) 91-112.
Nehamas, A. (2002): “Parmenidean Being / Heraclitean Fire,” in V. Caston & D.W. Graham (eds.), Presocratic Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos (Aldershot & Burlington: Ashgate, 2002) 45-64.
Owen, G.E.L., “Eleatic Questions,” [1960] revised and reprinted in Logic, Science, and Dialectic. Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy (London: Duckworth, 1986) 3-26.
Palmer, J., Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).
Palmer, J., Review of: M.V. Wedin, Parmenides’ Grand Deduction: A Logical Reconstruction of the Way of Truth. Ancient Philosophy 36 (2016) 209-214.
Pulpito, M., “Parmenides and the forms,” in N.-L. Cordero (ed.), “Parmenides, Venerable and Αwesome” (Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2011) 191-212.
Pulpito, M., “Il crocevia ontologico e i due volti della Doxa. Un’apologia della terza via in Parmenide,” Peitho. Examina Antiqua 6 (2015) 285-293.
Rapp, C., “Eleatischer Monismus,” in G. Rechenauer (ed.), Frühgriechisches Denken (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005) 290-315.
Reinhardt, K., Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie [1916] (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1985, 4th ed.).
Rossetti, L. & Marcacci, F., “Introduzione,” in N.-L. Cordero et al., Eleatica 2006: Parmenide scienziato? (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2008) 7-30.
Rossetti, L., “La structure du poème de Parménide,” Philosophie Antique 10 (2010) 187-226.
Ruggiu, L., Parmenide (Venezia & Padova: Marsilio, 1975).
Sisko, J. E. & Weiss, Y., “A Fourth Alternative in Interpreting Parmenides,” Phronesis 60 (2015) 40-59.
Thanassas, P., Die erste “zweite Fahrt”. Sein des Seienden und Erscheinen der Welt bei Parmenides (München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1997).
Thanassas, P., “Doxa revisitata,” in G. Rechenauer (ed.), Frühgriechisches Denken (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005) 270-89.
Thanassas, P., “How Many Doxai Are There in Parmenides?,” Rhizai 3 (2006) 199-218.
Thanassas, P., Parmenides, Cosmos, and Being. A Philosophical Interpretation (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2007).
Thanassas, P., “Parmenidean Dualisms,” in N.-L. Cordero (ed.), “Parmenides, Venerable and Αwesome” (Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2011) 289-308.
Tor, S., “Parmenides’ epistemology and the two parts of his poem,” Phronesis 60 (2015) 3-39.
Trépanier, S., Review of: M.V. Wedin, Parmenides’ Grand Deduction: A Logical Reconstruction of the Way of Truth. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 114 (2016) 129-133.
Vogel, C.J. de, Greek Philosophy. A Collection of Texts with Notes and Explanations. Volume I: Thales to Plato (Leiden: Brill, 1969, 4th ed.).
Wedin, M.V., Parmenides’ Grand Deduction: A Logical Reconstruction of the Way of Truth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
