“Como está o clima?”: avaliação das relações no ensino superior

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36482/1809-5267.ARBP2021v73i2p.100-111

Keywords:

Aquiescência, Universidade, Clima Educacional, Relação Professoraluno, Satisfação

Abstract

A percepção do estudante em relação ao ambiente escolar influencia no nível de envolvimento e na satisfação com o aprendizado. Sendo importante compreender quais fatores são mais importantes para que o estudante se sinta confortável em seu ambiente de estudo. Esse artigo propõe um instrumento que avalia o clima educacional e investiga a relação com satisfação com o curso, satisfação com a instituição e autoavaliação de  desempenho. Participaram 663 universitários (M = 22,48 anos; DP = 5,45).  Uma análise fatorial exploratória com interceptos randômicos indicou uma estrutura de dois fatores, a saber, Relações com Professores (RP) e Ambiente institucional positivo (AIP). A associação com variáveis externas foi avaliada via pathanalyses, em que RP foi o melhor preditor de satisfação  com o curso e AIP melhor preditor de autoavaliação do desempenho. Espera-se, com este estudo, contribuir para a compreensão dos aspectos facilitadores do processo de aprendizagem.

References

Aichholzer, J. (2014). Random intercept EFA of personality scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001

Bakhshialiabad, H., Bakhshi, M., & Hassanshahi, G. (2015). Students’ perceptions of the academic learning environment in seven medical sciences courses based on DREEM. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 6, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S60570

Bowman, N. A., Hill, P. L., Denson, N., & Bronkema, R. (2015). Keep on truckin’or stay the course? Exploring grit dimensions as differential predictors of educational achievement, satisfaction, and intentions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 639-645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615574300

Chen, S. C., Yang, S. J., & Hsiao, C. C. (2016). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1096-1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12278

Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd. ed.). New york: Guilford.

Lizote, S. A., Verdinelli, M. A., Borba, J. A., & Brasil, M. L. A. V. (2014). Satisfação dos acadêmicos com o curso de ciências contábeis: Um estudo em instituições de ensino superior privadas. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 7(3), 407-431. https://doi.org/10.14392/ASAA.2014070305

Lordache-Platis, M. (2015, April). Importance of the relational capital in universities: The students’ and professors’ approaches. In J. G. Cegarra Navarro (Org.), European conference on intangibles and intellectual capital (p. 237). London: Academic Conferences International Limited.

Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2: A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497-498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621613487794

Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2011). The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 340-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.564527

Loukas, A. (2007). What is school climate? Leadership Compass, 5(1), 1-3. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. (7th. Ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

Revelle, W. (2014). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. R package version 1.4.3. CRAN Project.

Rodrigues, A. S. S., & Liberato, G. B. (2016). Fatores determinantes da satisfação com a experiência acadêmica. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo Em Administração, 10(2), 18-33.

Roff, S. U. E., Mcaleeri, S., Harden, R. M., Al-qahtani, M., Uddin, A., Deza, H., … Primparyon, P. (1997). Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Medical Teacher, 19(4), 295-299.

Santos, A. A. A., Polydoro, S. A. J., Scortegagna, S. A., & Linden, M. S. S. (2013). Integração ao ensino superior e satisfação acadêmica em universitários. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 33(4), 780-793. https://doi.org/10.1590/S141498932013000400002

Schreiner, L. A. (2009). Linking student satisfaction and retention. Chicago: Noel-Levitz.

Sisto, F. F., Muniz, M., Bartholomeu, D., Pasetto, N. S. V., Oliveira, A. F., & Lopes, W. M. G. (2008). Estudo para a construção de uma escala de satisfação acadêmica para universitários. Avaliação Psicológica, 7(1), 45-55. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S167704712008000100007

Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353

Velicer, W. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41(3), 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293557

Wang, M., & Degol, J. L. (2015). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement , and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28: 315-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1

Wojahn, R. M., Ramos, S. P., & Carvalho, L. C. (2018). Proposta de modelo para avaliação da satisfação com a qualidade do ensino. Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina, 11(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2018v11n1p1

Downloads

Published

2022-06-22

Issue

Vol. 73 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

The approval of the text implies immediate and without charge assignment for the rights of publication in Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, which will have the exclusive right upon the first publication. Notwithstanding the above, the author retains the copyright to later publications. In case of republishing the paper in other media, it is recommended to mention the first publication in Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia.

Copyright for papers published in this journal are the authors', with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, the papers are free access for educational and non-commercial purposes.

Partial reproduction of other publications

Submitted manuscripts which contain extracts from other publications should comply with the specified limits to ensure originality of the submitted work. It is recommended to avoid reproducing figures, tables, charts or graphs extracted from other publications.

Manuscripts which contain reproduction of one or more figures, tables, charts or graphs extracted from other publications shall be forwarded to evaluation only if they are accompanied by written permission from the copyright holder of the original work for the specified reproduction in Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia. The permission should be addressed to the author of the submitted work. Under no circumstances Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia and the authors of the published papers in this Journal will transfer the rights thus obtained.