Interview with Martin Hilpert
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35520/diadorim.2019.v21n2a30979Palavras-chave:
Construction Grammar, Variation, ChangeResumo
We have gathered here questions that are of great interest to Brazilian researches developed in the field of Functional-Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammar centered on the experience of use and/or perception-processing/subjective evaluation. In this set of questions, Professor Martin Hilpert has the opportunity to reflect on some of our concerns, in order to contribute to the debate in Brazil on the constructional representation of stabilization, variation (by polysemy and similarity) and linguistic change phenomena.
Referências
BARDÐDAL, J. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2008.
BERGEN, B.; CHANG, N. Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understand. In: ÖSTMAN, J.; FRIED, M. (eds.). Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005, p. 147–90.
BOAS, H. C.; SAG, I. A. Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2012.
BOYD, J. K.; GOLDBERG, A. Learning What Not to Say: The Role of Statistical Preemption and Categorization in a-adjective Production”. Language, 87, p. 55–83, 2011.
BRÔNE, G.; ELISABETH, Z. Towards a dialogic construction grammar. A corpus-based approach to ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics, 25/3, p. 457-495, 2014.
CAPPELLE, B. Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions, Special Volume 1, p. 1–28, 2006.
CAPPELLE, B. Can we factor out free choice? In: DUFTER, A.; FLEISCHER, J.; SEILER, G. Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009, p. 183-199.
CROFT, W. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: University Press, 2001.
DEPPERMANN, A. Konstruktionsgrammatik und Interaktionale Linguistik: Affinitäten, Komplementaritäten und Diskrepanzen. In: LASCH, A.; ZIEM, A. (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 2011. p. 205-238.
DIESSEL, H. Usage-based construction grammar. In: DĄBROWSKA, E.; DIVJAK, D. (eds.). Handbook of cognitive linguistics, 2015. p. 295–321.
DIEWALD, G. Konstruktionen und Paradigmen. Konstruktionsgrammatik. Themenheft der Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, hg. Clemens Knobloch. Berlin: de Gruyter. ZGL, 37, p. 445-468, 2009.
FRIED, M.; BOAS. H. C. Grammatical Constructions: back to the roots. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005, p. 192-213.
GOLDBERG, A. Constructions: a construction approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.
GOLDBERG, A. Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (4), p. 327-356, 2002.
GOLDBERG, A. Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: University Press, 2006.
GOLDBERG, A. Constructionist Approaches. In: HOFFMANN, T.; TROUSDALE, G. (eds.). The Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 15-32.
GOLDBERG, A. Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In: NAS, L.; SAMVELIAN, P. (eds.) Approaches to Complex Predicates. Series: Syntax and Semantics, v. 41, 2016. p. 110-141.
GOLDBERG, A. Explain me this. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.
HERBST, T. Collo-Creativity and Blending: Recognizing Creativity Requires Lecical Strorage in Constructional Slots. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 66.3, p. 309-326, 2018.
HILPERT, M. Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.
HILPERT, M. From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward-strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 26, p. 1–36, 2015.
HILPERT, M. Three open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In: COUSSÉ, Evie; ANDERSON, P.; OLOFSSON, J. (eds.) Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar, 2018. p. 21-39.
HILPERT, M.; ÖSTMAN, J. (eds.) Constructions across Grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016.
HÖDER, S. Convergence vs. divergence from a diasystematic perspective. In: BRAUNMÜLLER, K.; HÖDER, S.; KÜHL, K. (eds.). Stability and divergence in language contact. Factors and mechanisms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014. p. 39–60.
HÖDER, S. Phonological elements in Diasystematic Construction Grammar. In: HILPERT, M.; ÖSTMAN, J. (eds.). Constructions across grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016, p. 67–96.
HOFFMANN, T.; BERGS, A. A Construction Grammar Approach to Genre. CogniTextes, 18, 2018. p. 1-20.
HOFFMANN, T.; TROUSDALE, G. Variation, change and constructions in English. Cognitive Linguistics. 22, 1, p. 1-23, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/13028043/TROUSDALE_2011_Variation_CHange_and_Constructions_in_English.pdf
HOPPER, P.; TRAUGOTT, E. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
KLAVAN, J. Evidence in linguistics: corpus-linguistic and experimental methods for studying grammatical synonymy. Dissertation (PHD in Philosophy). University of Tartu, Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics, 2012.
LANGACKER, R. Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
LEINO, J.; ÖSTMAN, J. Constructions and variability. In.: FRIED, M.; BOAS. H. C. Grammatical Constructions: back to the roots. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. (Constructional Approaches to Language), 2005. p. 192-213.
MACHADO VIEIRA, M. dos S. Variação e mudança na descrição construcional: complexos verbo-nominais. Revista LinguíStica / Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Volume Especial, p. 152-170, 2016.
MACHADO VIEIRA, M. dos S.; WIEDEMER, M. L. A variação no modelo construcionista da linguística funcional-cognitiva (2019, forthcoming).
PEREK, F. The status of alternations in construction grammar: a sorting task experiment. Cognitive Linguistics, 23–3, p. 601 – 635, 2012.
PEREK, F. Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015.
PEREK, F. Recent change in the productivity and schematicity of the way-construction: a distributional semantic analysis. Corpus Linguistic and Linguistic Theory, 2016.
PIJPOPS; D.; VAN DE VELDE, F. Constructional contamination: How does it work and how do we measure it? Folia Linguistica,50(2), p. 543-581, 2016.
SCHMID, H-J. (ed.) Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: how we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. Boston: APA and Walter de Gruyter, 2017.
SCHMID, H-J. The dynamics of the linguistic system. (forthcoming).
STEELS, L. Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.
STEFANOWITSCH, A.; GRIES, S. Th. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8/2, p. 209-243, 2003.
SUTTLE, L.; GOLDBERG, A. The partial productivity of Constructions as Induction. Linguistics, 49/6, p. 1237-69, 2011.
TORRENT, T. T. Entrevista. Usage-based models in linguistics: an interview with Joan Bybee. Revista LinguíStica, vol. 8, n. 1, p. 1-6, 2012.
TRAUGOTT, E.; TROUSDALE, G. Constructionalization and Construction changes. Great Britain: Oxford University Press, 2013.
VAN DE VELDE, F. Degenaracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In: Boogaart, R. Colleman, T, Rutten G. Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar. Mouton De Gruyter, 2014. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/34598764.pdf.
WOLFGANG, I. Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 2015.
ZIEM, A. Probleme und Desiderata einer Social Construction Grammar. In: ZIEM, A.; LASCH, A. (eds.). Konstruktionsgrammatik IV. Konstruktionen als soziale Konventionen und kognitive Routinen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 2015. p. 1-22.
ZIMA, E. Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V(motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y]. Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion (15), p. 1-48, 2014.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Transferência de direitos autorais - Autorização para publicação
Caso o artigo submetido seja aprovado para publicação, já fica acordado que o autor autoriza a UFRJ a reproduzi-lo e publicá-lo na Diadorim: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos e Literários, entendendo-se os termos "reprodução" e "publicação" conforme definição respectivamente dos incisos VI e I do artigo 5° da Lei 9610/98. O artigo poderá ser acessado pela internet, a título gratuito, para consulta e reprodução de exemplar do artigo para uso próprio de quem a consulta. Essa autorização de publicação não tem limitação de tempo, ficando a UFRJ responsável pela manutenção da identificação do autor do artigo.
A Revista Diadorim utiliza uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0).