Some notes on postverbal subjects in declarative (and other non-wh-) sentences

Autores

  • Ana Maria Martins Universidade de Lisboa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35520/diadorim.2020.v22n3a37144

Palavras-chave:

Subject. Order. Syntax.

Resumo

This paper discusses the syntactic and interpretative properties of sentences with immediately postverbal subjects (i.e. VSX constituent order) in European Portuguese. Two types of VSX word order are described and analyzed within the generative framework. One type in which, according to the proposed analysis, the verb and the postverbal subject stay inside the IP space and one type in which the verb or both the verb and the subject move to positions in the CP space, i.e. the sentential left periphery (Rizzi 1997, 2004, and subsequent cartographic approaches). The ‘IP type’ VSX sentences have a thetic, wide focus interpretation with no single constituent assigned any type of informational highlighting (Kuroda 1972, 2005). It is suggested that theticity is a kind of sensory (especially visual) evidentiality. This motivates the presence of an Evidential head in the functional structure of the IP, which is targeted by verb movement, deriving the postverbal position of the subject. Sentences with the ‘CP type’ VSX order do not constitute a homogeneous group, but share an evaluative import, generally conveying criticism. Under the proposed analysis, those bearing focus on the subject are derived by movement of the subject DP to Spec,FocusP (Rizzi 1997, 2004), which gives it the contrastive interpretation, and movement of the verb to a higher Evaluative head in the sentential left periphery (Ambar 1999, Corr 2016). Inverted conditionals (Iatridou and Embick 1994) and coordinate non-degree exclamatives (REFERENCE) share verb movement to Evaluative with subject-focus VSX sentences, but do not display contrastive or other highlighting of the subject, which signals that FocusP plays no role in their derivations.

Referências

AIKHENVALD, A. Y. Evidentiality. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

______. Evidentials: their links with other grammatical categories. Linguistic Typology, n. 19.2, p. 239-277, 2015.

AMBAR, M. Aspects of the Syntax of Focus in Portuguese. In: REBUSCHI, G.; TULLER, L. (eds.), The Grammar of Focus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999, p. 23-53.

ANDUEZA, P. Rhetorical Exclamatives in Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, 2011.

ARAÚJO, R. C. de; SIMIONI, L. A ordem VS em sentenças imperativas do português brasileiro. Letrônica. Revista Digital do Programa de Pós-graduação em Letras da PUCRS, n. 8.2, p. 204-315, 2015.

BELLETTI, A. Aspects of the Low IP Area. In: RIZZI, L. (ed.), The Structure of IP and CP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 16-51.

BIEZMA, M. Conditional inversion and Givenness. Proceedings of SALT, n. 21, p. 552-571, 2011.

BOCCI, G. On the Syntax-Prososdy Interface: An analysis of the prosodic properties of postfocal material in Italian and Its Implications. Nanzan Linguistics: Special Issue, n. 5, p.13-42, 2008.

BROWN, J. Evidentiality and polarity in Yorùbá. In: PETERSON, T.; SAUERLAND, U. (eds.), Evidence from Evidentials, The University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, n. 28, p. 9-28, 2010.

CARDINALETTI, A. Toward a cartography of subject positions. In: RIZZI, L. (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 115–165.

CARRILHO, E. Expletive ele in European Portuguese Dialects. Dissertação de doutoramento, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Lisboa, 2005.

CORR, A. V. Ibero-Romance and the syntax of the utterance. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2016.

CHUNG, K.-S. Deictic and Anaphoric Tense in Korean: A Two-Tiered Approach. M.A. dissertation, Simon Fraser University, 1999.

______. Space in Tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality and speech acts in Korean. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2012.

CINQUE, G. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

COLLINS, Ch.; ESSIZEWA, K. E. The Syntax of Verb Focus in Kabiye. In: PAYNE, D. L.; PEÑA, J. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2007, p. 191-203.

COSTA, J. Word Order Variation: A constraint-based approach. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 1998.

COSTA, J.; MARTINS, A. M. On Focus Movement in European Portuguese. Probus, n. 23.2, p. 217-245, p. 2011.

COSTA, J.; MARTNS, A. M. Middle Scrambling with Deictic Locatives in European Portuguese. In: BOK-BENNEMA, M.; KAMPERS-MANHE, B.; HOLLEBRANDSE, B. (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010, p. 59-76.

DE HAAN, F. Encoding speaker perspective: evidential. In: Zygmunt FRAJZYNGIER, Z.; HODGES, A.; ROOD, D. S. (eds.), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2005, p. 379-397.

ETXEPARRE, R.; URIA, L. Microsyntactic variation in the Basque hearsay evidential. In: FERNÁNDEZ, B.; ORTIZ DE URBINA, J. (eds.), Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2016, p. 265-288.

FORKER, D. Evidentiality and its relations with other verbal categories. In: AIKHENVALD, A. Y. (ed.), Yhe Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2018, p. 65-84.

GUTIÉRREZ-REXACH, J. The semantics of exclamatives. In: GARRETT, E.; LEE, F. (eds.), Syntax at Sunset. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, n. 1, p.146-162, 1996.

GUTIÉRREZ-REXACH, J.; ANDUEZA, P. Degree Restriction in Spanish Exclamatives. In: Luis A. ORTIZ-LÓPEZ (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla, 2011, p. 286-295.

IATRIDOU, S.; EMBICK, D. Conditional Inversion, Proceedings of NELS, n. 24, p. 189-203, 1994.

INCE, A. Pseudo-Sluicing in Turkish. In: KAZANINA, N.; MINAI, U.; MONAHAN, P.; TAYLOR, H. (eds.), University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, n. 14, p. 111-126, 2006.

JOHANNESSEN, J. B. Coordination. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

KALSANG, J. G.; SPEAS, M.; DE VILLIERS, J. Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan: evidence for a general theory of semantics of evidential. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, n. 31, p. 517-561, 2013.

KURODA, S.-Y. The categorical and the thetic judgments. Foundations of Language, n. 9, p.153–185, 1972.

______. Japanese Syntax and Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.

______. Focusing on the matter of topic: a study on wa and ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, n. 14, p.1-58, 2005.

LEONETTI, M. Spanish VSX. In: LAHOUSSE, K.; MARZO, S. (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Leuven 2012. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014, p. 37-64.

MARTINS, A. M. Clíticos na História do Português. Dissertação de doutoramento, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Lisboa, 1994.

______. Deictic Locatives, emphasis and metalinguistic negation. In: GALVES, Ch.; CYRINO, S.; LOPES, R.; SANDALO, F.; AVELAR, J. (eds.), Parameter Theory and Linguistic Change. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 2012, p. 213-236.

______. The interplay between VSO and coordination in two types of non-dregree exclamatives. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, n. 12, p. 95-123, 2013.

______. How much syntax is there in metalinguistic negation?. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, n. 32, p. 635-672, 2014.

______. Metalinguistic Negation. In: ESPINAL, M. T.; DÉPREZ, V. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Negation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 349-368.

MARTINS, A. M.; COSTA, J. Ordem dos constituintes frásicos: sujeitos invertidos, objetos antepostos. In: MARTINS, A. M.; CARRILHO, E. (eds.), Manual de Linguística Portuguesa. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2016, p. 371-400.

ONO, H. An Investigation of Exclamatives in English and Japanese: Syntax and Sentence Processing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park, 2016.

PETERSON, T.; SAUERLAND, U. (eds.). Evidence from Evidentials, The University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics n. 28, 2010.

RIZZI, L. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: HAEGEMAN, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1997, p. 281-337.

______. Locality and left periphery. In: BELLETTI, A. (ed), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 223–251.

______. Uniqueness of left peripheral focus, “further explanation” and Int. In: BAILEY, L.; SHEEHAN, M. (eds.), Syntactic Order and Structure in Syntax, Open Generative Syntax. Language Science Press, 2016, p. 333-343.

TORTORA, Ch. The syntax and semantics of the weak locative. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, 1997.

______. Evidence for a null locative in Italian. In: CINQUE, G. and SALVI, G. (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001, p. 313–326.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-12-23

Edição

Seção

Artigos de Língua