Sulla rivista
Foco e Escopo
A INTER: REVISTA DE DIREITO INTERNACIONAL E DIREITOS HUMANOS, é uma publicação acadêmica vinculada à linha de pesquisa em Direito Internacional e Direitos Humanos da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Sua missão é a difusão de trabalhos acadêmicos voltados às áreas de Direito Internacional e Direitos Humanos.
Processo de Avaliação pelos Pares
A Revista conta com um corpo permanente de pareceristas, membros de universidades brasileiras e internacionais.
As submissões à revista passam por processo de avaliação duplo cega por pares (double blind review), realizada por no mínimo dois especialistas no assunto de cada artigo.
Os pareceristas podem considerar o apto (e mesmo assim realizarem sugestões), com correções obrigatórias (que serão enviadas para o autor e retornadas para o parecerista para conferência) ou recusar a publicação. Para tornar-se apto para publicação o artigo não pode ter recebido nenhum parecer que o rejeite, mas poderá ser publicado artigo cujo parecer do avaliador requeira correções obrigatórias.
Retorno aos autores: Após a avaliação, os artigos retornam aos autores para ciência e eventuais correções. Após feitas as correções, há duas conferências, uma feita pelo parecerista e outra pela comissão executiva, para a efetiva certificação que as correções solicitadas foram realizadas.
O Editor e a Comissão Executiva da Revista montam uma pauta editorial prévia, atendendo aos critérios de qualidade, de mínimo número necessário de artigos e de exogênia de 80%. Após a formação da pauta, a comissão editorial reúne-se para avaliar o conjunto de artigos aceitos e finalizar a seleção.
A Revista publica ainda um artigo de grande relevância acadêmica de convidado. Este artigo é avaliado pelo Conselho Editorial, que analisa a pertinência temática com o foco e escopo da Revista e regras formais de publicação.
Periodicidade
Semestral.
Política de Acesso Livre
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
Ethic Policy
EDITORIAL ETHICS POLICY
1. INTER: UFRJ International Law and Human Rights Journal recognizes that academic ethics constitutes a fundamental value for a relevant knowledgeable network composition in the scientific environment, for which reason it assumes its commitment to observe and promote ethical standards among all the parties involved in the process of submission, evaluation and publication of articles in issues of this periodical.
2. Academic ethics should be the value that surrounds all stages of the editorial process. By making commitments to ethical behavior and the quality of publications, its repercussions will be seen directly in the quality of the papers received, evaluated, and published, in addition to the authors and the institutions that support them. We do not accept practices that indicate or resemble plagiarism, as well as any other behavior that is far from the required ethical standards.
3. The parties involved in the publication process of each issue of the journal assume, as a consequence, the commitment to act according to the ethical values present in the scientific field.
In particular,
a) Authors must submit their scientific work in accordance to results found, refraining from manipulating them according to their particular interests or presenting conclusions that do not provide sufficient details and references for the replication of the experiments by other researchers. When submitting a scientific paper, authors must ensure that the article is original, unpublished, and free of any elements that could eventually characterize a copy. Plagiarism, regardless of the form it takes, represents unethical and reproachable behavior, for which reason the journal will immediately reject the article, without prejudice to other measures. The duplicate submission of the scientific article to more than one journal also characterizes contrary behavior to the ethical norms of academia and, in cases like this, the scientific article will also be rejected. In the case of co-authorship, the submitting author should ensure that all co-authors agree with the final version of the article, as well as with its publication.
b) The editors must perform the desk review evaluation procedures solely according to scientific merit criteria of the submitted article, refraining from any kind of favoritism to those who may be close to them or even discrimination between authors for any reason. Regarding scientific articles still pending publication, editors are forbidden to use information obtained from such papers in their own research and publications without the express consent of the author responsible for publishing them. Editors also assume the commitment of confidentiality, consisting of the impossibility of disclosing any information about manuscripts submitted to the journal to any other person, except in cases of direct contact with members of the editorial board, reviewers and the author himself. In the event of complaints by authors or any other collaborators, it is the editors' duty to adopt immediate and effective responses to remedy the problem.
c) The reviewers must act, through the evaluation of the scientific papers submitted and according to their research experience, in a way that directly contributes to the journal's development. In the event of lack of the necessary qualification, either academic or even thematic, as well as conflict of interest, it is the reviewer's duty to communicate to the editorial team, as soon as possible, the impossibility of correctly evaluating the research, so that another reviewer may be designated without prejudice to the journal's deadlines. Throughout the scientific evaluation process, reviewers are committed to maintaining the confidentiality of privileged information or ideas obtained from the research being evaluated, and that they will not be used as a means of obtaining personal advantage. The evaluation of the manuscripts should be carried out through objective comments, allowing reviewers to use opinions structured in references and supporting arguments, without any offensive, discriminatory language, or language that is not in accordance with the reviewer's function.
This Academic Ethics Policy is based on recommendations by Elsevier and the COPE - Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Histórico do periódico
A Revista integra o RELAREDI (Red Latinoamericana de Revistas de Derecho Internacional) desde 2019 https://relaredi.wordpress.com/about/
