Preciado e o pensamento da contrassexualidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59488/tragica.v9i2.26776Keywords:
Nietzsche, SpinozaAbstract
Assim, o dildo se torna, pouco a pouco, um vírus que corrompe a verdade do sexo. Não é fiel à natureza dos órgãos. É o servo que se rebela contra o dono e, propondo-se como uma alternativa de prazer, torna irrisória a autoridade deste. Não existe utilização natural do dildo. Não há orifício que lhe esteja naturalmente reservado. A vagina não lhe é mais apropriada que o ânus. (Beatriz Preciado, Manifesto Contrassexual, p. 83)
Thisarticle aims to provide what it isprosthetically present in the Thought of countersexuality, as it is figured at (Paul) Beatriz Preciado’s Counter-sexual Manifesto. Therefore, this task can only be undertakenby presenting the outlines of that thought through its inheritances. That is, showingthat Preciado, as inheriting the thoughts of Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault and Judith Butler, but also Donna Haraway, Simone de Beauvoir, Monique Wittig and Teresa de Lauretis, intends to point to a new direction with regard to the thought of sex and gender. In other words, what we are proposing here is a brief outlining of what might be called a dildological thought
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) license. This license allows third parties to remix, adapt, and create from the published work, attributing authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publishing in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publishing a translation, or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
