Passivep and The Distinction Between Eventive, Resultative, and Statitive Passives 1¨

Authors

  • João Claudio de Lima Júnior Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)/ Laboratory of Psycholinguistics and Language Acquisition (LAPAL)
  • Marina Rosa Ana Augusto Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)/ Laboratory of Psycholinguistics and Language Acquisition (LAPAL)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35520/diadorim.2017.v19n0a13513

Abstract

Tis paper focuses the distinction between verbal and adjectival passive sentences. For that differentiation to be accounted for, a previous proposal considering a specifc functional node for eventive passives - passiveP (LIMA JÚNIOR; AUGUSTO, 2015) is retrieved. It is arguably assumed that the approach based on passiveP, besides maintaining a uniform analysis to active and passive sentences (as VoiceP in Collins (2005)), deals well with intervention issues, and is prosperous in addressing parametric variation and language acquisition facts. As far as the tripartite distinction among the different types of passives is concerned (EMBICK, 2004; DUARTE; OLIVEIRA, 2010), it is proposed that a main bipartite distinction between eventive and adjectival passives may be retained, which is here attributed to the presence of passiveP. Concerning stative and resultative passives, an agreement operation between the auxiliary verbs and the participle (LUNGUINHO, 2011) is assumed to allow for different readings to be obtained. A fourth group of passive-like sentences, involving participles, which have lost their connection with their original verbs, is also syntactically distinguished and treated as actual copular constructions.

Published

2017-10-30