Consensus or dissent?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58786/rbed.2022.v2.n2.55362Abstract
The purpose of this experience report is to present and critically reflect on the process and resulting products from Grua Flow Mexa project, implemented throughout the year of 2021. The project was con-templated by the 29 th edition of the Municipal Program Dance Fo-mentation to the São Paulo city and, invited by Grua, I`ve acted as dramaturgist in it. By presenting the genealogy of the two groups involved in the process, the proposal is to analyze the cooperation possibilities and the exchanges establishment between different artistic trajectories who have the Streets as their action field.
Downloads
Published
2022-11-02 — Updated on 2023-12-01
Versions
- 2023-12-01 (2)
- 2022-11-02 (1)
How to Cite
HERCOLES, Rosa. Consensus or dissent?. Brazilian Journal of Dance Research, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 341–355, 2023. DOI: 10.58786/rbed.2022.v2.n2.55362. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rbed/article/view/55362. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2024.
Issue
Section
Relatos de experiência
License
Authors who publish in the Revista Brasileira de Estudos em Dança are
responsible for the content of signed articles and retain copyright.
They grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously
licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License
(Open Archives Initiative - OAI). This feature, used for open-access journals,
allows sharing work for non-commercial purposes and acknowledges
authorship. If the text is later published in another vehicle, the author
must inform that it was initially published as an article in the Revista Brasileira
de Estudos em Dança. Therefore, even if the journal owns the first publication,
authors are entitled to publish their work in institutional repositories or on
their personal pages, even if the editorial process has not been completed.
The journal reserves the right to make normative, orthographic, and grammatical changes to maintain the language standard, respecting the authorial style.