"My Kingdom is not from this World”: Ronald Dworkin and the Challenge of Religion

Authors

  • Daniel Peixoto Murata Daniel Peixoto Murata é doutorando em Filosofia do Direito na University of Surrey (Reino Unido), bolsista em dedicação integral pela Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences da University of Surrey.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21875/tjc.v5i1.26738

Keywords:

Ronald Dworkin, Religion, Religious freedom, Robert George, Fundamental rights

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

The paper is a dialogue with Dworkin’s posthumous book, Religion Without God. Firstly, I intend to reconstruct accurately Dworkin’s argument in the book and in other recent writings, then I try to scrutinize how the dworkinian idea of a general right to ethical independence, instead of a special right to religious freedom, would apply in a concrete situation. Secondly, I analyze two objections that religious conservatives might advance against Dworkin’s liberal project. The first objection claims that the author unsuitably imports to religion a distinction between fact and value that is typical of philosophy, but not of religiosity. The second objection affirms that religion is a basic good of reflexive character, and not something individualistic as Dworkin defends. My conclusion is that religious freedom is a problem that demands a political solution, and that perhaps the most respectful position towards religion would recognize that some parts of it might be sacrificed in the name of other values we believe important.

Author Biography

Daniel Peixoto Murata, Daniel Peixoto Murata é doutorando em Filosofia do Direito na University of Surrey (Reino Unido), bolsista em dedicação integral pela Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences da University of Surrey.

Daniel Peixoto Murata é doutorando em Filosofia do Direito na University of Surrey (Reino Unido), bolsista em dedicação integral pela Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences da University of Surrey. Mestre em Filosofia e Teoria Geral do Direito pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (FDUSP), foi bolsista de mestrado pela Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP/processo: 2016/06243-0). Graduado em Direito pela FDUSP, foi estudante visitante na University of Glasgow (Escócia) e bolsista do Programa de Ensino Tutorial em Sociologia Jurídica (PET Sociologia Jurídica/SESu-MEC).

References

DOMINGO, Rafael. “Religion for Hedgehogs? An argument against the Dworkinian Approach to Religious Freedom”. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 2, Nº 2, 2013.

DWORKIN, Ronald. A matter of principle. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press, 1985.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Law’s empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Domínio da Vida. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Religion Without God. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.

FINNIS, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

FISH, Stanley. “Deeper than God: Ronald Dworkin’s Religious Atheism”. The New York Times, September 23, 2013. Disponível em: https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/23/deeperthangodronalddworkinsreligiousatheism/

GEORGE, Robert P. Making Men Moral – Civil Liberties and Public Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.

GEORGE, Robert P. In Defense of Natural Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

MOVSESIAN, Mark. “Religion Without God” (resenha). First Things, October 31, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/10/religionwithoutgod

SMITH, Steven. “Is God Irrelevant?”. Boston University Law Review, Vol. 94, 2014.

WILLIAMS, Bernard. “Liberalism and Loss”. In: LILLA, Mark; DWORKIN, Ronald; SILVERS, Robert (Eds). The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin. New York: New York Review of Books, 2001.

WILLIAMS, Bernard; HAWTORN, G. (ed.). In the Beginning was the Deed – Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005a.

WILLIAMS, Bernard. “From Freedom to Liberty: The Construction of a Political Value”. In: WILLIAMS, Bernard; HAWTORN, G. (ed.). In the Beginning was the Deed – Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005b.

WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations, 4th ed. Edited by P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

NOTÍCIAS:

https://www.nexojornal.com.br/expresso/2017/01/18/Como-est%C3%A1-a-discuss%C3%A3o-sobre-a-legalidade-do-sacrif%C3%ADcio-religioso-de-animais

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/06/14/pastor-refuses-to-mourn-orlando-victims-the-tragedy-is-that-more-of-them-didnt-die/

https://www.splcenter.org/hate-map

http://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2017/06/04/internacional/1496613230_454300.html

http://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2017/06/16/politica/1497624155_222166.html

Published

2020-07-09

Issue

Section

Seção Geral