The Eleatics and the Projects of Ontology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47661/afcl.v14i27.39982

Keywords:

Parmenides, Zeno, Melissus, ontology, inference, inquiry, language, not-being, contradiction

Abstract

Parmenides provides the earliest surviving Greek example of a thematic reflection on to eon, being or what-is; and on mē eon, not-being or what-is-not. His work was crucial to the framing of ontological questions and statements in later work. Zeno and Melissus made what-is or being (to on or to eon) a central focus and engaged directly with Parmenides’ reasoning and concerns.

        Within philosophy, the term ‘ontology’ may signify a study of the nature of being, or of what it is to be. Another important use of ‘ontology’ signifies a set of claims about the nature and number of being or what is, a kind of cataloguing.

        How best can we characterize what the Eleatics’ work has to do with ontology? In what if any ways, and in what if any contexts, can Parmenides, Zeno, or Melissus be said to study the nature of being or of what is? In what if any senses can Parmenides, Zeno, or Melissus be said to provide an account of the nature or number of being or of what is? Does any of the three espouse such an account; or do they engage with that kind of account in some other way? 

        I will argue that we find in the Eleatics three distinct approaches to ontological questions. I will suggest that Parmenides and Zeno, and likely Melissus, investigated the possibility of research into the nature and number of being as a problem; and cautioned against espousing direct unconditional accounts of the nature of what-is.

Author Biography

Rose Cherubin, George Mason University

Department: Philosophy

Areas: ancient Greek philosophy, pre-Socratics, early Greek poetry, early Greek numerical thought, sex and gender, race, epistemology, metaphysics

References

Académie française. Dictionnaire de l’Académie française. 9th ed. Paris: Impr. nationale, Académie française, 1986. Online at https://academie.atilf.fr/9/ . Accessed June 24, 2020.

Barnes, Jonathan. The Presocratic Philosophers. Rev. ed. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982.

Bollack, Jean. Parménide: De l’étant au monde. Verdier poche. Lagrasse: Verdier, 2006.

Brémond, Mathilde. Lectures de Mélissos: Édition, Traduction et interprétation des témoignages sur Mélissos de Samos. Berlin: De Gruyter, Inc., 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmu/detail.action?docID=5106143.

Cherubin, Rose. “Inquiry and What Is: Eleatics and Monisms.” Epoché 8, no. 1 (2003): 1–25.

—. “Why Matter? Aristotle, the Eleatics, and the Possibility of Explanation.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 26, no. 2 (2005): 1–29.

Clarke, Timothy. Aristotle and the Eleatic One. Oxford Aristotle Studies Series. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Cole, Thomas. “Archaic Truth.” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, n.s. 13.1 (1983): 7–28.

Constantineau, Philippe. “La Question de la Vérité chez Parménide.” Phoenix 41.3 (1987): 217–40.

Cordero, Nestor-Luis. “Zénon d’Élée, Moniste ou Nihiliste?” La Parola del Passato 43 (1988): 100–126.

Denniston, J. D. The Greek Particles. 2d ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.

Detienne, Marcel. Les maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque. Textes à l’appui, Histoire classique. Paris: Editions la Découverte, 1990.

Devaux, Michael, and Marco Lamanna. “The Rise and Early History of the Term Ontology (1606-1730).” Quaestio 9 (2009):

Galgano, Nicola Stefano. I precetti della dea: non essere e contraddizione in Parmenide di Elea. Storia della filosofia antica. Bologna: Diogene Multimedia, 2017.

—. “From Parmenides’ To Mē Eon To Melissus’ To Mēden.” Organon 2019, Volume 51 (2019): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.4467/00786500.ORG.19.001.11322.

Germani, Gloria. “ΑΛΗΘΕΙΗ in Parmenide.” La Parola del Passato 43 (1988): 177–206.

Graham, Daniel W. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

—. Science before Socrates: Parmenides, Anaxagoras, and the New Astronomy. Oxford University Press, 2013.

Harriman, Benjamin. “The Beginning of Melissus’ On Nature or On What-Is: A Reconstruction.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 135 (2015): 19–34.

Hermann, Arnold. To Think Like God: Pythagoras and Parmenides, the Origins of Philosophy. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2004.

Imbs, Paul, and Bernard Quemada. Trésor de la langue française: Dictionnaire de la langue du XIXe et du XXe siècle (1789-1960). Paris: Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 1971-1994. Online at http://atilf.atilf.fr/tlfi.htm . Accessed June 23, 2020.

Kahn, Charles H. “The Greek Verb ‘To Be’ and the Concept of Being.” Foundations of Language 2, no. 3 (1966): 245–65.

—. “The Thesis of Parmenides.” The Review of Metaphysics 22, no. 4 (1969): 700–724.

—. The Verb “Be” in Ancient Greek: With a New Introductory Essay. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 2003.

Krischer, Tilman. “ΕΤΥΜΟΣ und ΑΛΗΘΗΣ.” Philologus 109 (1965): 161–74.

Lamanna, Marco. “La naissance de l’ontologie à Saint-Gall : Jacob Lorhard et la métaphysique monastique. Un état de la question.” Les Etudes philosophiques 203, no. 3 (2020): 17–36.

Mourelatos, Alexander P. D. “Parmenides, Early Greek Astronomy, and Modern Scientific Realism.” In Early Greek Philosophy, edited by Joe McCoy, 91–112. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2013.

Palmer, John. Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

—. “Contradiction and Aporia in Early Greek Philosophy.” In The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, edited by George Karamanolis and Vasilis Politis, 9–28. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Pantelia, Maria, ed. Thesaurus Linguae Graecae® Digital Library. University of California, Irvine. http://www.tlg.uci.edu (accessed January 8, 2020).

Rézeau, Pierre; Bernard Quemada; Université de Besançon; Centre d’étude du vocabulaire français; Trésor général des langues et parlers français; Centre d’étude du français moderne; Institut national de la langue française. Base historique du vocabulaire français. Besançon: Centre d’étude du vocabulaire français, 1970. Online at http://atilf.atilf.fr/jykervei/ddl.htm . Accessed June 23, 2020.

Robbiano, Chiara. Becoming Being: On Parmenides’ Transformative Philosophy. International Pre-Platonic Studies 5. Sankt Augustin: Academia, 2006.

Rossetti, Livio. La filosofia non nasce con Talete: e nemmeno con Socrate. Bologna: Diogene 2015.

—. “Pseudophaēs e Pseudophanēs. La Luna secondo Parmenide.” In Apis Matina: Studi in Onore Di Carlo Santini, edited by A. Setaioli, 613–24. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016.

—. Un altro Parmenide. Volumen II, Luna, antipodi, sessualità, logica. Storia della Filosofia antica. Bologna: Diogene, 2017.

—. Lezioni eleatiche (forthcoming).

Sedley, David. “Zenonian Strategies.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 53 (2017): 1–32.

Smyth, Herbert Weir. Greek Grammar. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-01