History, documentary sources and future: Use of diplomatics for the analysis of contemporary digital documentation

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24206/lh.v10i1.63284

Palabras clave:

Archival science, diplomatics, documentary sources, electronic documents, genuineness.

Resumen

This study addresses the theme of the next or imminent use, as sources of the historical research, of digital documents that, over the last few years, have increasingly settled in the archives produced by individuals or organizations. Regarding this use, it is essential to be able to assess the genuineness of the digital documentation used as a historical source, on account of a few relevant differences existing between the traditional analog document and the digital one. This essay explores the primary role diplomatics can play just by identifying solutions for verification of the genuineness in a digital environment, beginning from its most recent currents of thought and research. Within the study of the digital document, the discipline is being moulded as a “boundary discipline” that incorporates contributions by other sciences and, as such, seems to be capable of elaborating an overview of the digital document that is distant from the mainly partial views so far developed by other sciences.

Citas

ALFIER, Alessandro (2018). La descrizione archivistica all’interno di sistemi complessi. In Descrivere gli archivi al tempo di RIC-CM. Macerata: EUM. P. 45-80.

ALFIER, Alessandro (2020). Il sistema di documentazione digitale. Milan: Editrice Bibliografica.

BRENNEKE, Adolf (1968). Archivistica. Contributo alla teoria e alla storia archivistica europea. Milan: Giuffrè.

CARUCCI, Paola (2000). Le fonti archivistiche: ordinamento e conservazione. Rome: Carocci.

DURANTI, Luciana (1989). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science. Part I. In Archivaria. Vol. 28, p. 7-27.

DURANTI, Luciana (2006). Verso una teoria archivistica di conservazione digitale: i risultati concettuali del progetto InterPARES. In Archivi. Vol. 1, no. 1, pages 75-97.

DURANTI, Luciana; PRESTON, Randy (2008). International Research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems (InterPARES) 2. Experiential, Interactive and Dynamic Records (Archivi. Vol. 3, no. 2). Padua: Cleup.

FERRARIS, Maurizio (2010). Documentalità. Perché è necessario lasciar tracce. Bari: Laterza.

INTERPARES (2001). Authenticity Task Force Report [Online]. [Consult. 3rd September 2021]. Available at: http://www.interpares.org/book/interpares_book_d_part1.pdf

INTERPARES (2002). Requirements for Assessing and Maintaining the Authenticity of Electronic Records [Online]. [Consult. 3rd September 2021]. Available at www.interpares.org/display_file.cfm?doc=ip1_authenticity_requirements.pdf

INTERPARES (2021). The InterPARES 2 Project Glossary [Online]. [Consult. 3rd September 2021]. Available at www.interpares.org/ip2/display_file.cfm?doc=ip2_glossary.pdf&CFID= 23827419&CFTOKEN=68074790

LODOLINI, Elio (2000). Archivistica. Principi e problemi. Milan: Franco Angeli, 2000 9

NICOLAJ, Giovanna (1986). Sentieri di diplomatica. In Archivio storico italiano. Vol. 144, no. 3, p. 305-331.

NICOLAJ, Giovanna (1998). Fratture e continuità nella documentazione fra tardo antico e alto medioevo. Preliminari di diplomatica e questioni di metodo. In Morfologie sociali e culturali in Europa fra tarda antichità e alto medioevo. Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’Alto medioevo. p. 953-984.

NICOLAJ, Giovanna (2007). Lezioni di diplomatica generale. I Istituzioni. Rome: Bulzoni.

PETRUCCI, Armando (1963. Diplomatica vecchia e nuova. Studi medievali. Vol. 4, no. 2, p. 785-798.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-03-15