From “filha de branco” to “romance da ama negra”:
the (anti?) colonial course of Lília da Fonseca
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35520/mulemba.2025.v17n33e67271Abstract
This paper aims to reflect on the trajectory of the Portuguese-Angolan writer Lília da Fonseca (1906-1991), based on her fictional texts in which she addresses the conditions of women in a space and time marked by the Portuguese occupation of Africa. From one text to another, we will seek to observe how she oscillates between an affirmation (even though reticent) of the presence and colonialist ideology to a profound questioning of the methods used to sustain the presence of Portuguese colonists. Taking into account, therefore, some theoretical assumptions about colonial literature (Ferreira, 1989; Laranjeira, 1997/1998; Mata, 2001, 2016), we propose an approach to female representations and their questions, to the point of questioning whether the author was not already assuming an anti-colonial stance.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).